Teams in CSIRO: Reorganising for national research imperatives

Mann, Leon; Marshall, Robert J.

doi:10.5172/impp.2007.9.2.136

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The flexible organizations show the resource reorganization capability in value network. The benefit of team dynamics and reorganization has been noticed at national level also (Mann and Marshall 2007). Flexible structures are less formal.…”

Section: Second-order Theme: Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Bock et al 2012;Dai et al 2017; Garcia-Feijöo and Howe 2010;Mann and Marshall 2007;Qiu and Li 2009;Steinbring et al 2013;Verdu et al 2009 (7) Braunscheidel and Suresh 2009; Chowdhury and Quaddus 2017; Garavelli 2003; Li and Kouvelis 1999; Rajesh 2017; Swafford et al 2008; Usui et al 2017 (7) Performance Supply chain flexibility, Optimal flexibility (2) Alan et al 2017; DuHadway 2017; Kristianto et al 2011; Li and Kouvelis 1999; Shukla and Sushil 2016; Song and Yu 2009; Tarafdar and Qrunfleh 2017; Wu et al 2017 (8) Allen et al 2013; Coenen and Kok 2014; Corominas et al 2005; Fresco et al 2006; Goldstein et al 2010; Haley and Miller 2014; Heywood and Miller 2015; Smith and Hutchinson 1994; Whyman and Petrescu 2015 (9) Amadeo and Horton 1997; Bajgoric 2000; Beltrán-Marơn and Roca-Puig 2013;…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Managerial Paradox Toward Flexibility: Emergent Views Using Thematic Analysis of Literature

Shukla

Sushil

Sharma

2019

Glob J Flex Syst Manag

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The organizational flexibility finds a substantial place in the literature; however, limited evidence of its institutionalization by managers is noticed. This paper analyzes the managerial paradox toward flexibility in managing business complexity, uncertainty handling, organizational reorientation, and structuring decisions across organizational functions. Thematic analysis is used to investigate the managerial flexibility paradox. The literature is identified in three categories related to workplace, frameworks or concepts, and business environment. It further shows two kinds of orientations: the first one deals with concerns in the implementation of flexibility, and the second showcases the concomitant benefits or performance. The literature related to concerns deals with uncertainty and risk management, while the performancerelated literature deals with the augmentation of flexibility theories. The practicing manager seeks advice in the literature to implement the concepts of flexibility and finds its limited availability. This is the prime reason for the emergence of managerial paradox. This paper recommends that future contributions should emphasize the guidelines for flexibility adoption while expounding the flexibility theories. The findings presented in this paper can potentially draw the attention of academicians and practitioners to devise the ways to implement and enhance organizational flexibility.

show abstract

Section: Second-order Theme: Sustainabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%