2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00710.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team supervision in multiprofessional teams: team members' descriptions of the effects as highlighted by group interviews

Abstract: The aim of the study was to describe the effects of team supervision in multiprofessional teams as perceived by team members. The literature describes team supervision as a way to develop collaboration in multiprofessional teams. However, little empirical research into the effects of team supervision is available. A research project was undertaken on five units of a university hospital between 1995 and 1998. Data were collected using group interviews with 62 interviewees and were analysed using qualitative con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings emerged from Berg and Hallberg's (2000) study of clinical group supervision that noted that group clinical supervision was limited in relation to the honesty in which nurse participants expressed their thoughts and feelings. Alternatively, Hyrkas and Appelqvist-Schmidlechner (2003) claim that team supervision is helpful in enhancing collaboration between team members, encouraging communication, sharing opinions and experiences, improving team working methods and motivation. For nurses in the current study, existing team strategies (e.g., nurse-multidisciplinary team handover and team meetings, nursing handover, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar findings emerged from Berg and Hallberg's (2000) study of clinical group supervision that noted that group clinical supervision was limited in relation to the honesty in which nurse participants expressed their thoughts and feelings. Alternatively, Hyrkas and Appelqvist-Schmidlechner (2003) claim that team supervision is helpful in enhancing collaboration between team members, encouraging communication, sharing opinions and experiences, improving team working methods and motivation. For nurses in the current study, existing team strategies (e.g., nurse-multidisciplinary team handover and team meetings, nursing handover, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying the experiences, needs, knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices that limit or facilitate a professional's ability to collaborate within health fields such as ASRH will provide insight into how this workforce can be better supported. Collaboration has been found to offer health workers supervisory support 12,13 and learning opportunities 14 but investigations must move beyond a focus on the health sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have almost exclusively focused on the subjective experiences of supervisees and analyzed them in the light of different models and theoretical approaches to supervision from, for instance, psychotherapy, counseling, or nursing (Kilminster & Jolly, 2000). Many of these studies maintain that CS provides a space for emotional relief, professional confirmation, and development of medical staff (Arvidsson, 2000;Gadgil, 1997;Hyrkäs & Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, 2003;Iskov, 1997;Pålsson et al, 1994;Teslo, 2000, pp. 34-36).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain why most studies report that employees who have been supervised feel better equipped to cope with the daily professional challenges and interactions both with colleagues and patients (Arvidsson, 2000;Pålsson et al, 1994). CS has also been described as a way of improving communication and collaboration in multi-or interdisciplinary teams 2 (Hyrkäs & Appelqvist-Schmidlechner, 2003;Pålsson et al, 1994); Pålsson et al (1994) maintained that CS can be an important strategy for improving health staffs' self-perception and confidence and thereby also for gaining a greater sense of their professional role in the team. The same points are made about CS in palliative care.…”
Section: Literature Review Clinical Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%