2005
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2005.18803929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team Locus-of-Control Composition, Leadership Structure, Information Acquisition, and Financial Performance: A Business Simulation Study

Abstract: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
84
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Individuals with an internal locus of control tend to believe that events are contingent upon their own behavior or relatively permanent characteristics. In the psychological literature, there is ample evidence that locus of control is a fundamental and stable personality trait, with clear behavioral consequences (Boone and De Brabander, 1993;Boone, Van Olffen and Van Witteloostuijn, 2005). The argument is that people with "more internal locus of control are more likely to exploit opportunities" and will thus with a higher probability engage in entrepreneurial activities (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000: 223), perform better as entrepreneurs (Brockhaus, 1980) or be more effective leaders (Boone, De Brabander and van Witteloostuijn, 1996).…”
Section: Key Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with an internal locus of control tend to believe that events are contingent upon their own behavior or relatively permanent characteristics. In the psychological literature, there is ample evidence that locus of control is a fundamental and stable personality trait, with clear behavioral consequences (Boone and De Brabander, 1993;Boone, Van Olffen and Van Witteloostuijn, 2005). The argument is that people with "more internal locus of control are more likely to exploit opportunities" and will thus with a higher probability engage in entrepreneurial activities (Shane and Venkataraman, 2000: 223), perform better as entrepreneurs (Brockhaus, 1980) or be more effective leaders (Boone, De Brabander and van Witteloostuijn, 1996).…”
Section: Key Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, de Vries and van Kampen (2010) use core personality traits to explain why certain individuals are more egoistic, pretentious or immoral, and Weller and Thulin (2012) and Weller and Tikir (2011) relate personality to risk-taking behavior. Furthermore, for instance, personality has been used by political scientists to explain voting behavior (e.g., Gerber et al, 2010), and general management scholars have explored the impact of personality in the context of a wide range of organizational processes and outcomes (e.g., Boone et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thereby some authors as Kilduff et al (2000), Pitcher and Smith (2001) and Carpenter et al (2004) has find that the result achieved regarding to Upper Echelon may be ambiguous in particular circumstances (Kauer et al 2007). According to this ambiguity and with other researchers (Priem et al 1999;Williams and O'Reilly 1998;Boone et al 2005;Hambrick 2007;Nielsen 2010;Lin and Cheng 2013) we consider that this complex relation rooted in Upper Echelon Theory needs to be further explored. New approaches and points of views are needed to affront the environmental complexity due to the current financial and business crisis and thereby, the transformation suffered by many companies to go on growth and survival in these business environment (Bohman and Lindfors 1998;Uhlenbruck et al 2003;Yamak and Usdiken 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%