A popular starting point for libraries engaging in research data management (RDM) services is a needs assessment (NA); a preliminary count identified more than 50 published NA case studies. However, no overarching analysis has yet been conducted. The authors compared assessments to characterize the case study institution types; establish the target population assessed; discover cross-institutional trends both in the topics covered and the issues identified; and determine remaining gaps in the literature. Thirty-seven studies conducted in the United States were included. Twenty-five were at public, doctoral, highest-research institutions. The most frequently assessed respondents were faculty (n = 3,847). The most frequent topics involved storing, sharing, and maintaining long-term access to data. Gaps include assessing students, staff, and nonfaculty researcher needs; determining needs at various sized and degree-granting institutions; and investigating RDM needs for non-STEM disciplines.Academic librarians have developed research data management (RDM) services and research over the past decade as researcher demands have derived from the implementation of the National Science Foundation Data Management Plan requirement 1 and the Office of Science and Technology Policy memorandum for increased access to federally funded research. 2 Librarians have undertaken reskilling, 3 and there has been extensive research into the preparation and engagement of librarians with research data management. 4 This has led to several papers describing opportunities for librarians to engage with researchers to meet these emerging needs and requirements. 5 Simultaneously, as libraries have looked internally to determine capacity and skill sets, there has been a desire to identify current RDM practices, issues, and needs. This has resulted in general cross-institutional surveys, 6 discipline-focused bibliographic reviews, 7 and discipline-wide surveys. 8 By far, however, the most common evaluation of researcher needs has come in the form of case studies at individual institutions. These have proliferated over the past decade, with so many having been done that, in their recent article on starting an RDM program, Henderson and Knott explicitly argue that no further surveys are needed. 9 While the majority of these case studies have been performed at US institutions, several case studies are also available from the England, Canada, and Australia. 10 Yet no articles exist that comprehensively review the depth and breadth of what has been surveyed. As a result, needs and practices remain inconsistently identified across institutional type, researcher level, and other categories.
MethodsLibrary literature indexes such as LISTA and general indexes such as Google Scholar were searched to populate an initial publication list. In addition, references and citations of initially identified articles were reviewed to discover more studies.Case studies were included if they focused specifically on the RDM needs and behaviors at a specific institution ...