1985
DOI: 10.2466/pms.1985.61.2.423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Team Approach in Mental Health Services: Generalists or Specialists?

Abstract: Psychiatrists, psychologists, and social workers were compared on their assessments of pathology, treatment techniques, and theoretical orientation for a typical hospitalized psychiatric patient. The purpose was to determine the relationship between treatment-team members' professional discipline and their clinical approach to a patient. Clinical discipline was significantly related to assessment, treatment, and theory. Psychiatrists favored medication, hospitalization, support, and brief, infrequent structure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1992
1992
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their REATMENT TEAMS ARE work groups effective hnctioning is key to their parent that perform key productive tasks organizations' successful operation; yet within mental health care such teams are susceptible t o various forms of dysfunction. Identified causes of team dysfunction include role confusion among team members (Banta and Fox, 1976); competition for authority and value (Kane, 1975a; Benarroche a n d Astrachan, 1983;Greenblatt, 1992); conflict o r uncertainty about team tasks, treatment philosophies, a n d models of care (Newton and Levinson, 1973;Shaw, 1985;Toseland et al, 1986); autocratic, regressive, o r otherwise "inadequate" team leadership (Kernberg, 1979;Nash, 1982;Mizrahi and Abramson, 1985;Fiorelli, 19881, and the unconscious process of work group regression (Bion, 1961;Kernberg, 1978;Yank e t al., 1992a). However, previous reviews of team functioning and pathology have not consistently integrated these several factors or addressed the structural and communication considerations pertinent to teams functioning in an organizational context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their REATMENT TEAMS ARE work groups effective hnctioning is key to their parent that perform key productive tasks organizations' successful operation; yet within mental health care such teams are susceptible t o various forms of dysfunction. Identified causes of team dysfunction include role confusion among team members (Banta and Fox, 1976); competition for authority and value (Kane, 1975a; Benarroche a n d Astrachan, 1983;Greenblatt, 1992); conflict o r uncertainty about team tasks, treatment philosophies, a n d models of care (Newton and Levinson, 1973;Shaw, 1985;Toseland et al, 1986); autocratic, regressive, o r otherwise "inadequate" team leadership (Kernberg, 1979;Nash, 1982;Mizrahi and Abramson, 1985;Fiorelli, 19881, and the unconscious process of work group regression (Bion, 1961;Kernberg, 1978;Yank e t al., 1992a). However, previous reviews of team functioning and pathology have not consistently integrated these several factors or addressed the structural and communication considerations pertinent to teams functioning in an organizational context.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%