2017
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.2017.1353459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching writing in economics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is little research on economics students' perceptions of their own writing, although there is a great deal on the types of writing assignments that economics professors can and do give their students. Schmeiser (2017), for example, discusses how to integrate writing into economics courses, providing numerous strategies for teachers such as policy briefs, peer review, blogs, process writing, and brainstorming. These suggestions largely replicate similar techniques used in the typical English course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is little research on economics students' perceptions of their own writing, although there is a great deal on the types of writing assignments that economics professors can and do give their students. Schmeiser (2017), for example, discusses how to integrate writing into economics courses, providing numerous strategies for teachers such as policy briefs, peer review, blogs, process writing, and brainstorming. These suggestions largely replicate similar techniques used in the typical English course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phillips' (2016) findings show higher benefits in outbound feedback when students actively give feedback through peer review compared to passively receiving it. Furthermore, Schmeiser (2017) argues that during the outbound process when students provide a review to their peers, they are exposed to new ideas and approaches, as well as sharing similar struggles with peers. A longer list detailed by Cho and Cho (2011) provides the benefits of peer review which could be easily implemented in the several stages of this scaffolded assignment.…”
Section: Time-saving Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some studies advocate the use of short writing assignments, such as one-minute papers (Chizmar & Ostrosky, 1998), 5-10 minute in-class papers (Crowe & Youga, 1986), short papers with a diverse audience (Simpson & Carroll, 1999), reflective papers of 150-300 words (Olmsted & Ruediger, 2013), and weekly writings (Dynan & Cate, 2005. Others advocate for longer, various, and scaffolded papers (Caviglia-Harris, 2020;Cohen & Williams, 2019;Schmeiser, 2017).…”
Section: Introduction and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%