2017
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2017.1302729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching the Practice of Leading Sense-Making Discussions in Science: Science Teacher Educators Using Rehearsals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the implementation of “student talk” was marginally lower in the method course for Program B. Perhaps related, Program B was the only program experiencing a negative change in “student talk”—leading us to wonder about the important connection of actually getting to rehearse practice in an authentic context and then enacting that practice during student teaching (Baldinger, Selling, & Virmani, ; Davis et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the implementation of “student talk” was marginally lower in the method course for Program B. Perhaps related, Program B was the only program experiencing a negative change in “student talk”—leading us to wonder about the important connection of actually getting to rehearse practice in an authentic context and then enacting that practice during student teaching (Baldinger, Selling, & Virmani, ; Davis et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of this phase the dataset was divided into 846 segments. A few segments (27) included discussions that referenced issues that were irrelevant to this analysis, such as personal issues, personal conflicts between group members, or questions and answers about course management and responsibilities. Segments that included these topics were eliminated from the dataset (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few segments (27) included discussions that referenced issues that were irrelevant to this analysis, such as personal issues, personal conflicts between group members, or questions and answers about course management and responsibilities. Segments that included these topics were eliminated from the dataset (27). The final classification presented here relates to the remaining 819 segments, which were eventually classified into a hierarchical thematic categorization composed of 23 categories organized in clusters and subclusters that reflect the nature and structure of knowledge, practices, and beliefs that were brought into the open during the interactions between the instructors and the preservice teachers over the evolving lesson plans (i.e., first research question).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The methods course instructor modeled each AST practice and provided opportunities for candidates to experience each practice as students of science. Following this demonstration, candidates worked in groups of four to five to plan and approximate the modeled practice with their peers via rehearsal (Davis et al, ). Thus, candidates had opportunities to practice and see the various forms of approximation conducted by their peers while playing the role of students, teachers, or observers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%