Teaching students “ideas‐about‐science”: Five dimensions of effective practice

Abstract

ABSTRACT:In this paper, we report work undertaken with a group of 11 UK teachers over a period of a year to teach aspects of the nature of science, its process, and its practices. The teachers, who taught science in a mix of elementary, junior high, and high schools, were asked to teach a set of "ideas-about-science" for which consensual support had been established using a Delphi study in the first phase of the project. Data were collected through field notes, videos of the teachers' lessons, teachers' reflective diaries, and instruments that measured their understanding of the nature of science and their views on the role and value of discussion in the classroom. In this paper, drawing on a sample of the data we explore the factors that afforded or inhibited the teachers' pedagogic performance in this domain. Using these data, we argue that there are five critical dimensions that distinguish and determine a teacher's ability to teach effectively about science. Whilst these dimensions are neither mutually independent nor equally important, they serve as a valuable analytical tool for evaluating and explaining the success, or otherwise, that individual teachers of science have when confronted with teaching aspects about science. In addition, we argue that they are an important means of identifying salient aspects of pedagogy for initial and in-service training of science teachers for curricula that incorporate elements of "ideas-about-science." C

No silver bullet for inquiry: Making sense of teacher change following an inquiry‐based research experience for teachers

“…Through classroom language and activity, teachers shape the ways in which students interact with science and learn about what is known and the processes of science (Lemke, 1990). Bartholomew, Osborne, and Ratcliffe (2004) describe the use of teachers' questions as a way teachers relay well-established knowledge about science.…”

From black and white to shades of grey

“…Discussions regarding the goals and aims of school science are far from novel, but have been a topic at least since the beginning of the twentieth century (Rudolph 2005). It is also evident that the diverging goals will be connected to very different forms of teaching, where the focus on concepts has been known to follow strict patterns of teacher-centered transmission of knowledge (Bartholomew et al 2004;Höttecke and Silva 2011).…”

“…Most teachers are deeply rooted in a school-science culture that has its starting point within science and uses the structured teaching formats connected to this way of viewing the goals of science education (Roberts 2011). This means that including new elements, both issues and teaching formats, that does not fit with the current teaching culture can be very challenging for teachers (Aikenhead 2006;Bartholomew et al 2004;Höttecke and Silva 2011). In a recent study, Leden et al (2015) reported on perspectives on NOS teaching put forward by teachers who had no previous NOS teaching experience.…”

An analysis of complex multiple‐choice science–technology–society items: Methodological development and preliminary results

“…Some studies argue that scholars exhibit divergences on these topics (Alters, 1997a(Alters, , 1997bSmith, Lederman, Bell, McComas, & Clough, 1997), whilst others claim that some consensus is emerging (Bartholomew, Osborne, & Ratcliffe, 2004;Lederman, Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Schwartz, 2002). Thus, the categories assigned to the statements are not a definitive or absolute system of classification, but a provisional and gradual one, as the understanding of STS topics is evolutionary, unstable, controversial, complex, and dialectical.…”

“…Because of the complex, controversial, and multifaceted character of STS questions, item scaling by judges provides a tentative form of agreement which has recently been recognized and used in science education research (Bartholomew et al, 2004;Lederman et al, 2002;Rubba & Harkness, 1993). In qualitative research, the researcher usually plays the role of judge in designing instruments and interpreting data; it seems clear that results from an independent panel of scholars have a better foundation and justification than the judgment of any individual.…”