Media and Information Literacy in Higher Education 2017
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-100630-6.00006-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Source Criticism to Students in Higher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a Stanford study, Wineburg et al (2016) found that 82% of schoolchildren could not recognise the difference between advertisements and original content. Researchers have expressed concern about what students do when they read and evaluate digital information (Puustinen & Rouet, 2009;Johannessen, 2016). It seems to be difficult for students to know if digital information has been reviewed (Kubiszeqski et al, 2011) and by whom and how they can check the quality of the information (Metzger & Flanagin, 2013;Walraven et al, 2009).…”
Section: Evaluating Online Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a Stanford study, Wineburg et al (2016) found that 82% of schoolchildren could not recognise the difference between advertisements and original content. Researchers have expressed concern about what students do when they read and evaluate digital information (Puustinen & Rouet, 2009;Johannessen, 2016). It seems to be difficult for students to know if digital information has been reviewed (Kubiszeqski et al, 2011) and by whom and how they can check the quality of the information (Metzger & Flanagin, 2013;Walraven et al, 2009).…”
Section: Evaluating Online Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its usefulness in journalism concerns how journalists, rather than seeking objective truths about the world, depart from how all sources of information are biased in one way or another (Steensen 2018). It is also linked with what is referred to as information literacy and a general ability to assess sources of information in relation to the growing quantity of available information (Johannessen 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%