2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Requestive Downgraders in L2: How Effective are Written vs. Oral Output-Based Tasks?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of their study showed that both groups maintained the positive effects of treatment and time were not significant on pragmatic tests. Other similar study in investigating the requestive downgraders performed by Ghafar Samar and Ahmadi (2014) claims that the dictogloss as a written output-based task raises learners awareness of the requestive downgraders. The results of this study also revealed that neither the effects of instructional treatment nor the effects of time were significant between the participants on the perception and production measures.…”
Section: Request Speech Actmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The findings of their study showed that both groups maintained the positive effects of treatment and time were not significant on pragmatic tests. Other similar study in investigating the requestive downgraders performed by Ghafar Samar and Ahmadi (2014) claims that the dictogloss as a written output-based task raises learners awareness of the requestive downgraders. The results of this study also revealed that neither the effects of instructional treatment nor the effects of time were significant between the participants on the perception and production measures.…”
Section: Request Speech Actmentioning
confidence: 87%