“…It is often claimed that everyday life lacks analogies for the concept of recursion (Pirolli and Anderson, 1985), so it is no surprise that most authors come up with the same objects, such as cauliflowers, including the healthy broccoli, ringed targets, tree branches, reflections on facing mirrors, tilings (Chu and Johnsonbaugh, 1987), ladders (Levy and Lapidot, 2002) and Russian dolls (Bowman and Seagraves, 1985). Typical geometric figures are fractals (Riordon, 1984b, Elenbogen and O'Kennon, 1988, Wakin, 1989, Bruce et al, 2005, Ammari-Allahyari, 2005, Stephenson, 2009b, Gordon, 2006 and certain kinds of artwork, most notably by the Dutch graphic artist M. C. Escher (Gunion et al, 2009b). Their structures are characterised by self-replication with selfembedding (also called nesting), but, unfortunately, these examples are perhaps more likely to suggest infinity than recursion (whose evaluation must terminate to be useful and, in the case of embedded recursion, may require backtracking), and this involuntary association of infinity and recursion may explain the avoidance of the latter by novices (Wiedenbeck, 1989).…”