Teaching programming by emphasizing self-direction

Abstract

Lecturing is known to be a controversial form of teaching. With massed classrooms, in particular, it tends to constrain the active participation of students. One of the remedies applied to programming education is to use technology that can vitalize interaction in the classroom, while another is to base teaching increasingly on programming activities. In this article, we present the first results of an exploratory study, in which we teach programming without lectures, exams, or grades, by heavily emphasizing programming activity, and, in a pedagogical sense, student self-direction. This article investigates how students reacted to the active role required of them and what issues emerged in this setting where self-direction was required. The results indicate three issues that should be taken into account when designing a student-driven course: the challenge of supporting students' theoretical synthesis of the topics to be learned, the individual's opportunities for self-direction in a group work setting, and mismatch between individual learning processes and academic course scheduling. ACM Reference Format:Isomöttönen, V. and Tirronen, V. 2013. Teaching programming by emphasizing self-direction: How did students react to the active role required of them? ACM Trans. Comput.

Best Practice in Distance Learning with Experimental Demonstration on the Concept of the Automotive Brake Pad Fabrication from Domestic Waste to Vocational Students for Supporting Education for Sustainable Development

“…The presence of various media may motivate students more (Puspitarini & Hanif, 2019;Nicol & Macfarlane, 2006). In contrast to Conventional learning (the teacher explains the material and the students listen), when the teacher explains the material, the students may not be as focused on listening carefully because students must also take notes on important points (Kanninen, 2009;Isomöttönen & Tirronen, 2013). Improved learning outcomes occur because experiments make it easier for students to understand the learning material.…”

Do Computer Science Students Understand Their Programming Task?—A Case Study of Solving the Josephus Variant Problem

“…Fortunately, TI changes during the problem-solving enterprise (Rivera-Reyes, 2015; Rivera-Reyes, Lawanto, & Pate, 2017), suggesting that even though students may start with inaccurate explicit and implicit TI, they may gain the correct interpretation while solving the task, providing they continuously monitor themselves and are open to necessary adjustments. Isomöttönen & Tirronen (2013) argues that having relevant knowledge and skills on the given task is necessary for accurate and efficient self-monitoring activities. Further, when students are familiar with the discipline-related knowledge, values, skills, and expertise, they tend to have more accurate TI and be more competent of selecting effective domain-specific strategies (Butler & Winne, 1995;Hadwin et al, 2009).…”