Content Knowledge in English Language Teacher Education 2020
DOI: 10.5040/9781350084650.0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Pedagogical Grammar in English Language Teacher Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Keshavarz (2012), errors are systematic, rulegoverned, and caused by the learner's insufficient knowledge of the rules of the target language, while mistakes are random deviations from rules and therefore do not appear to be systematic. Harmer (2018) clarified that learners make errors when they either do not know something well or are affected by developmental or interference factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Keshavarz (2012), errors are systematic, rulegoverned, and caused by the learner's insufficient knowledge of the rules of the target language, while mistakes are random deviations from rules and therefore do not appear to be systematic. Harmer (2018) clarified that learners make errors when they either do not know something well or are affected by developmental or interference factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Junqueira & Kim (2013) concluded from their research that teachers' prior experiences, as students, prejudiced their beliefs as well as classroom activities on corrective feedback. Research works that focused on the positive and potential negative effects of corrective feedback include those of Harmer (2012), Brookhart (2008), Hattie & Timperly (2007), Gebhard (2006), Lyster &Ranta (1997), andLightbrown &Spada (1999) just to mention a few. On the affirmative view, corrective feedback on students' language errors could assist the learners' learning growth such that it could give them knowledge of what is accepted and unaccepted in the scope of the jurisdiction (Gebhard, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the affirmative view, corrective feedback on students' language errors could assist the learners' learning growth such that it could give them knowledge of what is accepted and unaccepted in the scope of the jurisdiction (Gebhard, 2006). In Harmer (2012), corrective feedback was perceived as averting the fossilization of errors, since errors that go uncorrected develop into internalized parts of students' learning. Such a situation obstructs students from proficiency as their stock of learned materials becomes mixed with flawed representations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borg (2009) and Borg and Sanchez (2020) take up the issue of teacher cognition again, while Griffiths (2012) focuses on the teacher and concludes ‘teachers are individuals with their own desires, families, preferences, needs, individual differences, beliefs, and characteristics’ (p. 475). Harmer (2012) deals with essential teacher knowledge and Barkhuizen (2017) devotes a book to a collection of chapters on teacher identity. Mercer and Kostoulas (2018) discuss topics related to teacher psychology and Gkonou, Dewaele, and King (2020) compare teacher emotions to a ride on a rollercoaster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%