1992
DOI: 10.1080/0748763920080206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Meaning Vocabulary: Productive Approaches for Poor Readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, after only receiving 18 minutes of instruction (two minutes of instruction per word) across three consecutive days, both groups were able to receptively identify a minimum of seven words, define a minimum of four words, and provide the label for a minimum of two words at posttesting. These findings are exciting because 300–400 words should be taught a year (McKeown et al, 1985; Stahl & Shiel, 1999) and similar gains as seen in this study required between 360–1,080 minutes of adult provided instruction (Lubliner & Smentana, 2005; Nash & Snowling, 2006; Nelson & Stage; Twyman, McCleery & Tinda, 2006). Some researchers might argue that students in the current study only acquired rudimentary knowledge of the words (Nagy & Anderson, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, after only receiving 18 minutes of instruction (two minutes of instruction per word) across three consecutive days, both groups were able to receptively identify a minimum of seven words, define a minimum of four words, and provide the label for a minimum of two words at posttesting. These findings are exciting because 300–400 words should be taught a year (McKeown et al, 1985; Stahl & Shiel, 1999) and similar gains as seen in this study required between 360–1,080 minutes of adult provided instruction (Lubliner & Smentana, 2005; Nash & Snowling, 2006; Nelson & Stage; Twyman, McCleery & Tinda, 2006). Some researchers might argue that students in the current study only acquired rudimentary knowledge of the words (Nagy & Anderson, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For example, “The man bought food with ru bies .” Written text corresponding to the spoken word was provided for each of the above three activities. After each activity, the student was given time to mentally generate an answer after which the correct the answer and an explanation were provided (Juel & Deffes, 2004: Stahl & Shiel, 1999). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Documenting these different types of talk can provide important insight for potentially guiding teacher preparation program curriculum intended to support teachers' use of im-pactful classroom talk. Our research provides unique evidence to categorize teacher talk to promote students' interest and attention to words (Stahl & Shiel, 1999). Teacher preparation programs should prioritize explicit instruction on language use to promote word consciousness, as this study shows that the majority of teachers were not frequently engaging in talk that was associated with student gains in standardized vocabulary scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A growing body of research indicates that learners' morphological development can be productively enhanced through direct instruction of the relationships between root forms and their affixed family members. This morphological awareness raising through word analysis techniques appears to be effective for all groups of learners, including L1 Children (Cunningham 1998;Stahl and Shiel 1992), L2 children (Carlo et al 2004), and L2 adults (Mirhassani and Toosi 2000).…”
Section: Developmental and Language Background Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%