Teaching management in the context of Grand Challenges: A pragmatist approach

Abstract

This article builds on the pragmatist approach of Grand Challenges to derive pedagogical strategies for management education, especially for courses that aim to prepare students to face the unprecedented context of multi-crises. The notion of Grand Challenges, used to frame the multiple problematic situations that characterize the context, echoes the flourishing literature on responsible management learning and education, which claims an urgent need to rethink management education to deal with issues of increasing inequality, human rights, and climate change. The responsible management learning and education literature encompasses three pedagogical approaches, including a pragmatist approach. We rely on Dewey’s pragmatist philosophy of education to enrich this approach and develop pedagogical strategies for preparing students to intervene in the context of Grand Challenges. We suggest a view of knowledge as tool for transformation and of the classroom as a community of inquiry working to intervene in problematic situations. We illustrate the strength of these pedagogical strategies through an account of an educational experience in a course of Design and Management of Social Innovation.

Reimagining Business Ethics as Ethos-Driven Practice: A Deweyan Perspective

“…Above all, conceptual refinement in operationalizing the transitions between different ethos conceptions should both guide and be informed by interdisciplinary empirical investigations into real-world ethoi as suites of valued modes of conduct. To fully validate this new ethos-focused paradigm, its relevance, applicability and practicality might best be tested against the grand challenges of the Anthropocene (Mailho & Lachapelle, 2022).…”

Narrating future(s) with others: teaching strategic sustainability management in a relational key

“…Developing future scenarios emphasising that the future is made through connections between human and nonhuman matters, events, and existences also allows developing a critical stance towards management without leading to a sense of powerlessness (Mailhot & Lachapelle, 2022). Its relational ontology counters the hierarchical relationship between organisation and environment, between human and nature that prevails in most management education, including future scenario planning with its tendency to either prepare for dealing with the erratic force of the environment or to control it, thereby shaping the future (singlehandedly).…”