Teaching interactive signing in a dialogue situation to mentally retarded individuals

Keogh, Deborah; Whitman, Thomas L.; Beeman, David Gerard; Halligan, Kelly; Starzynski, Thomas

doi:10.1016/0891-4222(87)90039-4

Cited by 40 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The pigeon experimental situation shares some features of the interactions between parents and children with autism or other developmental disabilities (Keogh et al 1987;Reichle et al 1986). Children with autism are often minimally verbal and unable to report their private experiences to others.…”

Section: Implications and Human Parallelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Species and individual differences in communication based on private states

Lubinski¹,

Thompson²

1993

Behav Brain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The way people come to report private stimulation (e.g., feeling states) arising within their own bodies is not well understood. Although the Darwinian assumption of biological continuity has been the basis of extensive animal modeling for many human biological and behavioral phenomena, few have attempted to model human communication based on private stimulation. This target article discusses such an animal model using concepts and methods derived from the study of discriminative stimulus effects of drugs and recent research on interanimal communication. We discuss how humans acquire the capacity to identify and report private stimulation and we analyze intra- and interspecies differences in neurochemical mechanisms for transducing interoceptive stimuli, enzymatic and other metabolic factors, learning ability, and discrimination learning histories and their relation to psychiatric and developmental disabilities.

show abstract

Section: Implications and Human Parallelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Species and individual differences in communication based on private states

Lubinski¹,

Thompson²

1993

Behav Brain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Implications and Human Parallelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communication and internal states: What is their relationship?

Bamberg¹

1993

Behav Brain Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Common folks “have” emotions and talk to others; and sometimes they make “their” emotions the topic of such talk. The emotions seem to be “theirs,” since they can be conceived of as private states (or events); and they can be topicalized, because we seem to be able to attribute or lend a conventionalized public form (such as a linguistic label or name) to some inner (and therefore nonpublic) state or event. This is the way much of our folk-talk and folk-thinking about emotions, the expression thereof, the role of language in these expressions, and communication in general are organized. However, as we have shown (Bamberg & Lindenberger 1984), such talk serves the purpose of communicating effectively and reaching mutual understanding.

show abstract

Mental Retardation

Madle¹,

Neisworth²

1990

International Handbook of Behavior Modification and Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Teaching interactive signing in a dialogue situation to mentally retarded individuals

Cited by 40 publications

References 23 publications

Species and individual differences in communication based on private states

Species and individual differences in communication based on private states

Communication and internal states: What is their relationship?

Mental Retardation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About