2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching individuals with intellectual disability to email across multiple device platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The types of interventions included the following: a sports training programme to examine social bonding (Bota et al, ), a longitudinal cohort study monitoring participation in daytime activity (Gray et al, ) and a coaching package on task engagement and social interactions (Gilson & Carter, ). In addition, a training module for developing social competence (Iconaru & Ciucurel, ), studies using digital platforms, for example email use, a home‐based social media intervention, video‐based instruction to increase social network and task engagement (Cihak et al, ; Davies et al, ; Gibson & Carter, ; Raghavendra, Newman, Grace, & Wood, ; Walsh, Holloway, & Lydon, ), a dog‐walking programme to gain confidence to engage socially (Bould, Bigby, Bennett, & Howell, ), and a community employment and education programme (Schneider & Hattie, ). Others included the following: a research project named GO4KIDDS (Great Outcomes for Kids Impacted by Severe Developmental Disabilities) that examined the social participation and friendships among kids (Taheri, Perry, & Minnes, ), a structured supported social group (Wilson et al, ), a peer‐supported intervention including a randomized control trial (RCT) (Asmus et al, , ) and a social skills programme to improve employment‐related social competence (Walsh et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The types of interventions included the following: a sports training programme to examine social bonding (Bota et al, ), a longitudinal cohort study monitoring participation in daytime activity (Gray et al, ) and a coaching package on task engagement and social interactions (Gilson & Carter, ). In addition, a training module for developing social competence (Iconaru & Ciucurel, ), studies using digital platforms, for example email use, a home‐based social media intervention, video‐based instruction to increase social network and task engagement (Cihak et al, ; Davies et al, ; Gibson & Carter, ; Raghavendra, Newman, Grace, & Wood, ; Walsh, Holloway, & Lydon, ), a dog‐walking programme to gain confidence to engage socially (Bould, Bigby, Bennett, & Howell, ), and a community employment and education programme (Schneider & Hattie, ). Others included the following: a research project named GO4KIDDS (Great Outcomes for Kids Impacted by Severe Developmental Disabilities) that examined the social participation and friendships among kids (Taheri, Perry, & Minnes, ), a structured supported social group (Wilson et al, ), a peer‐supported intervention including a randomized control trial (RCT) (Asmus et al, , ) and a social skills programme to improve employment‐related social competence (Walsh et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raghavendra et al () in their study reported an increase in the length in communication, and more meaningful messages after the implementation of a targeted social media intervention. Similarly, Cihak et al () reported email use as another form of communication that may ease social isolation. Walsh et al () evaluated the effectiveness of a social skills curriculum and video modelling to increase social communication and reported overall social competence, and as a result, problem behaviour decreased.…”
Section: Discussion Of Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may explain the individual need to change to the most personalised Internetenabled device when possible in each setting. In studies on developing or teaching cognitively accessible interface to persons with intellectual disabilities, its use in everyday settings or over time was reported to be lacking (Cihak et al, 2015;Davies et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, cognition has an impact on word processing skills, which is an important digital competence when using the Internet (Wu, Chen, Yeh, Wang, & Chang, 2014). To overcome difficulties with digital literacy skills among persons with intellectual disabilities, different devices have been successfully used when teaching emailing (Cihak, McMahon, Smith, Wright, & Gibbons, 2015), and a cognitively accessible interface prototype has been developed for social media use, which showed support for increasing independent use of the Facebook (Davies et al, 2015). However, these studies were done with few participants in controlled settings and research is lacking on access and use in the everyday settings where Internet-enabled devices are to be used (Ólafsson et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although technology is not a remedy for all the challenges and difficulties students with disabilities experience, research evidence suggests that it can be used as a tool to support learning and increase opportunities to engage in a task and participate in instruction. However, for successful use of tablet devices to be ensured for students with disabilities, it is necessary to move from just providing more tablet devices to investing in how to develop effective instructional practices that can be accompanied by tablet devices (Cihak, McMahon, Smith, Wright, & Gibbons, ). Considering the potential benefits of using tablet computers for instructional purposes in teaching students with disabilities, there is a need to evaluate (a) whether the effectiveness of TAI for students with disabilities addressed across intervention studies can be asserted based on methodological rigour and (b) if instructional approaches applied in TAI studies are promising enough to be evidence‐based for students with disabilities.…”
Section: Tablet‐assisted Instruction Approaches For Students With Dismentioning
confidence: 99%