Abstract: Research suggests that honors students are more likely to be engaged in some, but not all, aspects of the college experience, although there is less information available from the faculty perspective. This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing various engagement-related practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two items… Show more
“…Miller and Dumford (2018) found evidence that honors students were more likely to engage in the use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, and student–faculty interaction when compared to their general education counterparts. Likewise, honors faculty was more likely to encourage collaborative learning, use of learning strategies, and student–faculty interaction (Miller et al, 2021). Students in honors programs were also found to be higher on subjective well-being compared with their non-honors peers (Plominski & Burns, 2018), and have reported that participation in honors brought about rewarding interpersonal experiences with other honors students (Mammadov et al, 2018; Perrone et al, 2010).…”
Previous research has suggested mixed results concerning gifted populations and achievement goal orientation. This study investigated achievement goal orientation in honors and general education undergraduate students, exploring the factor structure of a commonly used assessment and looking at ability level differences using two types of statistical analyses. Responses from 8,530 students across 15 different universities indicated that the Achievement Goal Questionnaire – Revised (AGQ-R) is an adequate measure of the construct for honors and general education students. While independent samples t-tests showed that honors students are higher for several orientations, these differences disappeared in follow-up regression analyses that controlled for demographic characteristics. These results support the importance of appropriate assessment tools and inclusion of control variables when looking for differences between gifted and non-gifted populations.
“…Miller and Dumford (2018) found evidence that honors students were more likely to engage in the use of learning strategies, collaborative learning, and student–faculty interaction when compared to their general education counterparts. Likewise, honors faculty was more likely to encourage collaborative learning, use of learning strategies, and student–faculty interaction (Miller et al, 2021). Students in honors programs were also found to be higher on subjective well-being compared with their non-honors peers (Plominski & Burns, 2018), and have reported that participation in honors brought about rewarding interpersonal experiences with other honors students (Mammadov et al, 2018; Perrone et al, 2010).…”
Previous research has suggested mixed results concerning gifted populations and achievement goal orientation. This study investigated achievement goal orientation in honors and general education undergraduate students, exploring the factor structure of a commonly used assessment and looking at ability level differences using two types of statistical analyses. Responses from 8,530 students across 15 different universities indicated that the Achievement Goal Questionnaire – Revised (AGQ-R) is an adequate measure of the construct for honors and general education students. While independent samples t-tests showed that honors students are higher for several orientations, these differences disappeared in follow-up regression analyses that controlled for demographic characteristics. These results support the importance of appropriate assessment tools and inclusion of control variables when looking for differences between gifted and non-gifted populations.
“…Both honors programs and honors colleges provide a unique context in which to combine CBE and transdisciplinary approaches because they historically serve as an academic testing environment for innovative pedagogical practices (Sederberg, 2008; Miller et al, 2021). Honors programs, in general, typically provide connections for students to engage in enriching educational experiences (Furtwengler, 2015) in an advanced academic environment that promotes considerable rigor.…”
The honors college at a large land-grant research university developed transdisciplinary courses to provide undergraduate opportunities for small, student-centered classes and collaborative problem engagement in a global context. In these courses, students engage principles of competency-based education and inquiry-based learning combined with instruction in transdisciplinarity and decision-making tied to the college mission statement and course learning outcomes. As an observational study, we surveyed 91 honors students from 12 transdisciplinary courses over three semesters, asking five-point Likert scale questions and open-ended perspective questions at the beginning and end of each semester. Participants predominantly identified as White (74%), male (57%), senior-level students (67%), and represent 34 majors. Findings emphasize outcomes of lasting faculty relationships and opportunities to explore interests outside students’ majors, which respondents report influencing their academic development. Students also report areas for curricular improvement in developing research skills and engaging problem-focused experiences. We describe new offerings made to address findings.
“…Framing service learning as a pedagogy of engagement, Stewart (2012), using pretesting and posttesting, found that honors students who participated in a service-learning program improved their sense of community connectedness, civic attitudes, and civic efficacy. More recently, research from Miller and colleagues (2021) found that faculty who teach honors courses were more likely to encourage engagement in the areas of student–faculty interaction, learning strategies, and collaborative learning, compared to their faculty peers who did not teach honors courses, yet there were no discernable differences in other areas such as higher-order learning and quantitative reasoning. Although the role of faculty is important, there is little research on faculty support for various HIPs for honors students, although research indicates that in general, effective HIPs include faculty support (Kuh, 2008).…”
Section: Faculty In Honors Colleges and Programs And Hipsmentioning
Much of the existing research on honors colleges or programs is focused on the student experience, with less information offered concerning the faculty perspective. This study presents findings from the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE), comparing support for high-impact practices between faculty who teach honors courses and those who do not. Along with core FSSE items, this study uses responses from 1,487 faculty members at 15 institutions on two experimental items about teaching honors courses. A series of ordinary least squares and binary logistic regression analyses suggest that faculty who teach honors courses are more likely to supervise undergraduates on research and internships and to think that it is important for students to participate in learning communities, study abroad, and research with faculty. These findings are interpreted within the context of previous research and current theory, bridging knowledge from the fields of higher education and gifted education.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.