2013
DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2013.769995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Fourth and Fifth Graders to Evaluate Information Sources During Text Comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0
23

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
5
84
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…neutral condition) made students be less selective as regards which information to attend while reading and which information to include in the final task. These results replicate the findings found for perspective instructions in single-text situations (Kaakinen & Hyönä, 2005 and they also demonstrate how having a specific guidance to read a set of texts may also help students better attend to source cues (Macedo- Rouet et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…neutral condition) made students be less selective as regards which information to attend while reading and which information to include in the final task. These results replicate the findings found for perspective instructions in single-text situations (Kaakinen & Hyönä, 2005 and they also demonstrate how having a specific guidance to read a set of texts may also help students better attend to source cues (Macedo- Rouet et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…When reading multiple documents there is a clear need to be selective and focus on information which may be reliable and related to the task. Recent research has demonstrated that students' may have difficulties interpreting source information (Goldman & Scardamalia, 2013) and that specific task conditions, such as the type of instructions provided for reading, may influence how students discriminate the trustworthiness and relevance of the information (Macedo- Rouet, Braasch, Britt, & Rouet, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, elementary school students may believe that everything on the Web is true (Schacter et al 1998), may not perceive conflicts of information across sites (Mason & Boldrin 2008), and may not appeal to source characteristics when indicating the most knowledgeable source (Macedo- Rouet et al 2013). Middle school students too may take into account only the content and form of an Internet page (Barzilai & Zohar 2012), or naïve criteria, such as its easy comprehensibility (Mason et al 2010a), in their judgments.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Online Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A third approach to foster multiple document comprehension is training readers to become more aware of source information and to evaluate the quality and validity of the sources (e.g., Braasch, Bra ten, Strømsø, Anmarkrud, & Ferguson, 2013;Brem, Russell, & Weems, 2001;Britt & Aglinskas, 2002;Macedo-Rouet, Braasch, Britt, & Rouet, 2013, Stadtler & Bromme, 2007Wiley et al, 2009). Such trainings aim at educating readers on how to discriminate reliable from unreliable documents based on source attributes, such as publication type or date of publication.…”
Section: Conditions Fostering Elaborative Processing Of Conflicting Imentioning
confidence: 99%