1998
DOI: 10.1080/1057356980140203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Children With Reading Problems to Decode: Phonics and “Not‐phonics” Instruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The opposite of systematic is embedded instruction in which patterns are taught as they “come up” in text reading. We suggest that teachers in a school agree on one phonics scope and sequence (see Figure 1) so children are not navigating between different sequences in different settings (i.e., whole class instruction vs. resource room vs. small groups (Stahl, 1998)). If teachers agree upon one scope and sequence, then instruction is more cohesive for students, there is a common language, and learning is efficient.…”
Section: What Is the Best Sequence For Teaching Phonics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opposite of systematic is embedded instruction in which patterns are taught as they “come up” in text reading. We suggest that teachers in a school agree on one phonics scope and sequence (see Figure 1) so children are not navigating between different sequences in different settings (i.e., whole class instruction vs. resource room vs. small groups (Stahl, 1998)). If teachers agree upon one scope and sequence, then instruction is more cohesive for students, there is a common language, and learning is efficient.…”
Section: What Is the Best Sequence For Teaching Phonics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical research Apfelbaum et al, 2013;Bruck et al, 1998;Chen, 2018;Chu & Chen, 2014;Christensen & Bowey, 2005;Dahl et al, 1999;Double et al, 2019 ;Ehri & Flugman, 2017;Johnston et al, 2011;Lloyd-Elredge et al, 1990;Machin et al, 2018;McGeown & Medford, 2013;Nishanimut et al, 2013;Ok et al, 2021;Roberts & Meiring, 2006;Shapiro & Solity, 2008Stuart, 1999;Thompson & Johnston, 2007;Vadasy & Sanders, 2010, 2011, 2012White, 2005 Theoretical-descriptive perspective Gardner, 2008;Groff, 1998;Gunning, 1995;Hall, 2006;Johnston & Watson, 2006;Norman & Calfee, 2004;Rasinski et al, 2008;Reutzel et al, 2014;Rosowsky, 2005;Stahl, 1992Stahl, , 1998Wyse, 2000 Review studies & conclusions Bowey, 2006;Cunningham & Cunningham, 2002;Johnston et al, 2009;Rupley, 2009 Disagree with the negative view of research on Phonics Brooks, 2007;Buckingham, 2020;…”
Section: Dimension 3 Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hildren with disabilities in reading and writ-~~ ten expression often have difficulty grasping basic word identification and spelling skills (Aaron & Joshi, 1992) due to a lim-~t~~~ ited understanding of the phonological and orthographic structures of words (Levy & Carr, 1990). Moreover, even if these students may have acquired phonemic awareness and are able to recognize some words by sight, they usually have difficulty making letter-sound correspondences (Stahl, 1998). Lacking skills in making letter-sound associations often results in difficulties reading words that are new to the learner (Adams & Henry, 1997).…”
Section: Helping Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%