2017
DOI: 10.1177/0731948717701260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching Children With Language-Learning Disabilities to Plan and Revise Compare–Contrast Texts

Abstract: Children need to demonstrate sufficient writing skills to meet curriculum demands for writing and to succeed in their classes, as well as to deepen understanding of themselves and the world (Graham & Perin, 2007). However, writing often is a difficult and complex task that requires children not only to have the cognitive resources for producing varied texts, such as topic, genre, and linguistic knowledge and specific writing skills and techniques, but also to have adequate meta-cognitive abilities to monitor t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is equally important that the instructional methods used are effective and efficient. This presents a challenge, as there is very little research directed at how to teach writing to children classified with SLI (see De La Paz, 2001; McCurdy, 2002; Shen & Troia, 2018 for notable exceptions). Until such research takes place, it seems prudent to draw on evidence-based practices shown to be effective with other children who experience difficulties with writing (e.g., see Gillespie & Graham, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is equally important that the instructional methods used are effective and efficient. This presents a challenge, as there is very little research directed at how to teach writing to children classified with SLI (see De La Paz, 2001; McCurdy, 2002; Shen & Troia, 2018 for notable exceptions). Until such research takes place, it seems prudent to draw on evidence-based practices shown to be effective with other children who experience difficulties with writing (e.g., see Gillespie & Graham, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, SCRDs have been used to test the effects of interventions for students with a LD in a variety of areas including writing (e.g., Datchuk & Rogers, 2018; Shen & Troia, 2018), video modeling (e.g., Satsangi et al., 2019), and mathematics interventions (McKevett et al., 2020). Furthermore, systematic reviews designed to identify whether specific practices can be identified as EBPs for students with LD include SCRDs.…”
Section: Use Of Scrd In Ld Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, we coded any writing task with a time limit greater than 10 min as extended. When possible, we removed designated planning time from time limits (e.g., 10 min of planning and 30 min of composition was coded as 30 min) or coded writing duration (i.e., time spent by students engaged in sustained writing) to better estimate writing fluency; this was the case for five studies, or 12% of included studies (Asaro- Saddler & Saddler, 2010;Miller & Little, 2018;Saddler, 2006;Shen & Troia, 2018;Southall, 2011). Similar to prior reviews (Datchuk & Kubina, 2013;, we coded for several aspects of the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC; 2020) standards of methodological quality: experimental design, number of phases, data points per phase, fidelity, and interobserver agreement (IOA).…”
Section: Data Coding and Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most acquisition studies featured a SRSD strategy to teach planning, writing, and revising an essay or narrative (Asaro- Saddler, 2014;Asaro-Saddler & Bak, 2012;Asaro-Sad-dler & Saddler, 2010;Caroll, 2018;Hashey, 2015;Levy, 2018;Lewandowski, 2011;MacArthur & Philippakos, 2010;Mourgkasi & Mavropoulou, 2018;Nordness et al, 2019;Ray et al, 2019;Saddler, 2006;Southall, 2011;Werunga, 2018). Several SRSD studies included multiple strategies for planning and/ or revising (McKeown et al, 2015;Shen & Troia, 2018), or SRSD was supplemented with visual supports, such as student-drawn pictures for planning (Dunn, 2012(Dunn, , 2015Dunn & Miller, 2016) and production of video selfmodels (Miller & Little, 2018). Besides SRSD, the remaining acquisition studies included graphic organizer instruction (Bishop et al, 2015;Gonzalez-Ledo et al, 2015;Unzueta & Barbetta, 2012) and technology-based graphic organizers with strategy instruction and selfregulation components (Ahn, 2017;Evmenova et al, 2016;Good, 2019).…”
Section: Independent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%