Teaching and Learning the Skill of Intubation Using Telehealth Glasses

Foronda, Cynthia; Crenshaw, Nichole; Briones, Patricia; Snowden, Kenya; Griffin, Malcolm; Mitzova-Vladinov, Greta

doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2019.12.005

Cited by 9 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One study that surveyed users of telehealth glasses for TFI reported that the technology was “bulky and uncomfortable,” “distracted from the learning,” and had other technical issues. Another study evaluated educational value of the TFI (rated 9.5/10) and reported that 11 of 12 users had no issues obtaining the laryngoscope view or hearing the guidance provided ( 18 ). A similar study surveyed users regarding quality of imaging and reported that the average rates were 7/9 for video and audio quality and 7.8/9 for overall quality ( 20 ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twelve of the studies were conducted in a simulation environment (5, 6, 8, 9, 11–16, 18, 20) and five were performed in clinical environments (7, 10, 17, 19, 21). Only three of the 11 proof of technology demonstrations were performed in a clinical environment (17, 19, 21).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While limited fidelity of the video and audio technology was reported in three studies, the majority did not indicate this as being a barrier to successful implementation ( 12 , 19 , 20 ). Ergonomic challenges with tele-glasses were discussed in one study and did present a distraction and a potential limitation for implementation of this technology for TFI ( 18 ). While technological limitations were infrequently reported in the studies, it is important to recognize that the majority of the TFI systems evaluated were customized setups that are not commercially available.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review

Levin

Chang

Bittner

2021

Critical Care Explorations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Teleguidance Technology for Endotracheal Intubation: A Scoping Review

Levin

Chang

Bittner

2021

Critical Care Explorations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Here, we offer recommendations for each, building upon prior recommendations. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] Simulator Factor Recommendations…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Simulation for Neonatal Endotracheal Intubation Training

Soghier

Walsh²,

Goldman³

et al. 2021

Sim Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a critical skill that is difficult for learners to acquire even with simulation-based training (SBT). Trainees prefer clinical experiences over SBT. The objective of the study was to explore the differences between SBT and clinical practice in acquiring neonatal intubation skills to inform mannequin design and to improve fidelity. Methods: A basic qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted to determine the experience of newly competent trainees (second-and third-year neonatalperinatal medicine fellows) and their instructors in developing intubation skills. Participants were asked to compare learning through SBT with clinical practice in terms of context, equipment, and environment. Their responses were analyzed using an inductive approach. Results: Thirty-two participants (20 fellows and 12 faculty) indicated that SBT does not equal the real experience. Specifically, the look, feel, and function of the simulators differ enough from the real patient and the clinical environmental that they do not elicit the desired learning responses. The clinical environment prompted heightened emotions and had a chaotic atmosphere that was not fully captured by SBT. Participants suggested that programs use SBT in the initial phases of training only to gain basic skills and they provided several solutions for mannequin and SBT session design. Conclusions: Simulation-based training does not fully prepare neonatal-perinatal medicine fellows for neonatal intubation. Mannequins with unique active features, such as multiple airway configurations, slipperiness, secretions, and softer textures should be developed. Realistic environments that replicate the interprofessional nature and stressors of the clinical environment might better prepare learners for the complexity of clinical practice.

show abstract

“… 27 It provides nursing students with a more realistic and immersive environment when they are practicing clinical skills, thus contributing to their command of professional knowledge and skills. 28 , 29 Some AR telehealth glasses 30 and simulation applications 31 have been developed to guide and assist the students to complete the simulated intubation in a manikin or train them to identify the symptom of stroke of the mannequin patient and act accordingly. As a result, the advantages of AR such as visualization, immediate feedback, and innovative methods should never be underestimated.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%