2004
DOI: 10.1177/0145482x0409801204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching and Assessing the Appropriateness of Uncontracted Braille

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also evidence that familiar contractions are related to faster word recognition (Millar, 1997;Nolan & Kederis, 1969). Although theoretical stances support both the early and late introduction of contractions, sufficient empirical research does not exist to resolve the debate (Herzberg, Stough, & Clark, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also evidence that familiar contractions are related to faster word recognition (Millar, 1997;Nolan & Kederis, 1969). Although theoretical stances support both the early and late introduction of contractions, sufficient empirical research does not exist to resolve the debate (Herzberg, Stough, & Clark, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Troughton reported improved outcomes for her students who used uncontracted braille and particularly advocated its use with students who had learning disabilities, cognitive disabilities, and limited tactile sensitivity and were English language learners. More recent research has suggested that experienced teachers think that uncontracted braille is preferable for reading instruction for some students (Herzberg, Stough, & Clark, 2004) and that there may be little significant difference between the reading abilities of students who start with contracted and those who start with uncontracted braille (Hong & Erin, 2004).…”
Section: The 1980s To the Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%