DOI: 10.26481/dis.19941007sb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching and assessing diagnostic interviewing skills : an application to the mental health field

Abstract: People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simulations are time consuming because trainees can only perform them individually and because each trainee's behavior has to be assessed separately by trained assessors. The weak reliability of the simulation is caused by the content specificity of this method (Bögels, 1994; Spitzberg & Cupach, 1989; Vu & Barrows, 1994). This means that the trainees' performance on one simulation is hardly generalizable to other situations because the simulation consists of one case (client or patient).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations are time consuming because trainees can only perform them individually and because each trainee's behavior has to be assessed separately by trained assessors. The weak reliability of the simulation is caused by the content specificity of this method (Bögels, 1994; Spitzberg & Cupach, 1989; Vu & Barrows, 1994). This means that the trainees' performance on one simulation is hardly generalizable to other situations because the simulation consists of one case (client or patient).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%