2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2005.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teaching anatomy: Cadavers vs. computers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
120
1
18

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
120
1
18
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the study of medical students showed that only 60% of an elearning group successfully passed a final examination compared to 82% of a cadaveric dissection group (Biasutto et al, 2006). Cadaveric dissection cannot therefore be replaced by e-learning.…”
Section: Ambivalent Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the study of medical students showed that only 60% of an elearning group successfully passed a final examination compared to 82% of a cadaveric dissection group (Biasutto et al, 2006). Cadaveric dissection cannot therefore be replaced by e-learning.…”
Section: Ambivalent Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, many health science schools are diminishing the curriculum time (Leung et al, 2006) and reducing the time allotted to traditional basic science disciplines . In this context, the traditional morphology education based on topographical structural anatomy taught by didactic lectures and complete dissection of the body with personal tuition has been replaced by a multiple range of special study modules, problem-based workshops, computers, plastic models and many other teaching tools (Aziz et al;Disnmore et al, 1999;Rizzolo;Biasutto et al). In some centers, dissected cadaver-based anatomy is no longer taught (Biasutto et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-clinical disciplines are essential for all health and biological science courses (Regan de Bere & Mattick; Aziz et al;Disnmore et al, 1999;Rizzolo, 2002;Biasutto et al, 2006). Among them, anatomy is considered to be the basis of morphological sciences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When comparing dissections, prosections and plastinated models of anatomical structures in a subjective study, many students chose dissections to be most useful in the acquisition of knowledge (Reilly, Wearn & Riordan, 2013). To further support this, a recent study shows that traditional teaching groups that were taught using a cadaver gave better results than the technological support group (Biasutto, Caussa & Criado del R'io, 2006); this suggests that the computer resources cannot replace the unique teaching tool of the cadaver (Winkelmann, 2007), as the direct appreciation of tissues and anatomical structures is lost (Biasutto, Caussa & Criado del R'io, 2006). This study took place from 1999 to 2004, and involved a total of 873 medical students.…”
Section: Dissesctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%