Teachers' trust in AI‐powered educational technology and a professional development program to improve it

Abstract

Evidence from various domains underlines the critical role that human factors, and especially trust, play in adopting technology by practitioners. In the case of Artificial Intelligence (AI) powered tools, the issue is even more complex due to practitioners' AI‐specific misconceptions, myths and fears (e.g., mass unemployment and privacy violations). In recent years, AI has been incorporated increasingly into K‐12 education. However, little research has been conducted on the trust and attitudes of K‐12 teachers towards the use and adoption of AI‐powered Educational Technology (AI‐EdTech). This paper sheds light on teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech and presents effective professional development strategies to increase teachers' trust and willingness to apply AI‐EdTech in their classrooms. Our experiments with K‐12 science teachers were conducted around their interactions with a specific AI‐powered assessment tool (termed AI‐Grader) using both synthetic and real data. The results indicate that presenting teachers with some explanations of (i) how AI makes decisions, particularly compared to the human experts, and (ii) how AI can complement and give additional strengths to teachers, rather than replacing them, can reduce teachers' concerns and improve their trust in AI‐EdTech. The contribution of this research is threefold. First, it emphasizes the importance of increasing teachers' theoretical and practical knowledge about AI in educational settings to gain their trust in AI‐EdTech in K‐12 education. Second, it presents a teacher professional development program (PDP), as well as the discourse analysis of teachers who completed it. Third, based on the results observed, it presents clear suggestions for future PDPs aiming to improve teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech. What is already known about this topic Human factors, and especially trust, play a critical role in practitioners' adoption of technology. In recent years, AI has been incorporated increasingly into K‐12 education. Little research has been conducted on the trust and attitudes of K‐12 teachers towards the use and adoption of AI‐powered Educational Technology. What this paper adds This research emphasizes the importance of increasing teachers' theoretical and practical knowledge about AI in educational settings to gain their trust in AI‐EdTech in K‐12 education. It presents a teacher professional development program (PDP) to increase teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech, as well as the discourse analysis of teachers who completed it. It presents clear suggestions for future PDPs aiming at improving teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech. Implications for practice and/or policy Pre‐ and in‐service teacher education programs that aim to increase teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech should include a section providing teachers with a basic understanding of AI. PDPs aimed to increase teachers' trust in AI‐EdTech should focus on concrete pedagogical tasks and specific AI‐powered tools that are considered by teachers as helpful and worth the effort to learn. AI‐EdTech should not restr...

Is it time we get real? A systematic review of the potential of data-driven technologies to address teachers' implicit biases

“…For instance, teachers may be reluctant to accept AI-based data-driven technology recommendations when they contradict their previous knowledge about their students due to their confirmation bias (Nazaretsky et al, 2021 ). However, presenting teachers with some explanations of (i) how data-driven technologies make predictions, particularly compared to the human experts, (ii) how they can complement and give additional strengths to teachers, rather than replacing them, and then (iii) allowing them to discuss this in groups, can indeed reduce some of the biases of teachers, particularly within social sensemaking contexts (Nazaretsky et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, this model recognizes that aspects of social sensemaking can play on emotions as a motivation for debiasing (represented by the addition of emotional strategies , in purple).…”

“Replacing teachers? Doubt it.” Practitioners' views on adaptive learning technologies' impact on the teaching profession

“…Teachers may be ill-prepared to face this situation, resulting in (perhaps healthy) distrust with learning technologies. Nazaretsky et al (2022) argue that the key to gaining a teacher's trust is teacher agency: technologies should not restrict teachers to follow specific pedagogical scenarios and should allow teachers modify or override recommendations given by the technology. Moreover, Luckin et al (2022) suggest AI readiness training for educators to be better equipped in leveraging AI to the benefit of learners.…”

The Use of Gamification as a Vehicle for Pedagogic Sharing and Teachers’ Professional Development

“…There was also a core of teachers who reported that the effectiveness of CPD was diminished by the demands of normal teaching workloads. Nazaretsky et al (2022) emphasize the importance of increasing teachers' theoretical and practical knowledge about digital technologies in educational settings through CPD. Zimmer and Matthews (2022) develop this point by emphasizing on coaching as one innovative approach to professional development, addressing teachers concerns over staying current with changing technology.…”