2008
DOI: 10.1080/02568540809594656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers' Talk in Preschools During Circle Time: The Case of Revoicing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, to enhance authenticity, the authors and research members participated in peer debriefings throughout the analytic process. Circle time distinguishes itself from common daily learning activities because of its specific organizational structure and relatively rigid pattern of situationbased actions (Yifat & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, 2008). From an anthropological perspective, the circle's repetition and unique characteristics closely relate to ritual properties and practices.…”
Section: Qualitative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, to enhance authenticity, the authors and research members participated in peer debriefings throughout the analytic process. Circle time distinguishes itself from common daily learning activities because of its specific organizational structure and relatively rigid pattern of situationbased actions (Yifat & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, 2008). From an anthropological perspective, the circle's repetition and unique characteristics closely relate to ritual properties and practices.…”
Section: Qualitative Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Circle time is one of the most widely applied strategies for classroom organization throughout the world, particularly in early childhood education 1 (Cefai et al, 2014;Lang, 1998;Morek, 2013;Mosley, 2005;Yifat & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, 2008). Despite the fact that the understanding of circle time varies from country to country because of cultural and historical traditions (Lang, 1998), researchers from various fields have emphasized the overall benefits of circle time (Emilson & Johansson, 2013;Leach & Lewis, 2013;Mary, 2014;Mosley, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Children need to demonstrate listening, while educators might instruct and encourage children in the appropriate way to listen. Listening is shown by certain body postures, such as sitting upright and looking forward, by certain facial expressions, such as eye contact and appropriate emotional expressions, through the medium of language, using age-appropriate words to communicate, and by self-regulation, such as taking turns talking (Garforth, 2009;Mosley & MyiLibrary, 2005;Yifat & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, 2008;Zaghlawan & Ostrosky, 2011). The environment is generally understood as passive within these listening contexts, and the child and educator act (MacNaughton, 2003).…”
Section: Seeking the Otherwise: Attending To The Complexities Of Listmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Revoicing occurs in many educational contexts (from kindergarten [Yifat & Zadunaisky-Ehrlich, 2008] to undergraduates [Flood et al, 2015]) and across a wide variety of subjects (from mathematics [Krussel & Edwards, 2004] and science [e.g., Ruiz-Primo & Furtak, 2007] to second-language learning [e.g., Park, 2013] and liberal arts seminars [Parsons, 2017]). Scholars argue that revoicing is pedagogically advantageous because it can (a) promote deeper full-class exploration of student-generated ideas [Forman & Ansell, 2002], (b) highlight particular elements of student ideas while backgrounding other elements [Nam, Ju, Rasmussen, Marrongelle, & Park, 2008], (c) extend and reshape the content of student contributions to resemble disciplinarily normative concepts [Eckert & Nilsson, 2017], (d) help students adopt disciplinarily normative language and representations [Forman & Larreamendy-Joerns, 1998], and (e) promote participation by explicitly valuing and soliciting student contributions [Strom, Kemeny, Lehrer, & Forman, 2001].…”
Section: Ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis and Co-operative Amentioning
confidence: 99%