2016
DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2016.1258667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Implicit Meaning Systems and Their Implications for Pedagogical Thinking and Practice: A Case Study from Finland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
55
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, some Finnish teachers believe that the academic competence of poorly achieving students is malleable, yet that of high achieving students is stable [43,44]. Other teachers' beliefs on this issue can be just the reverse [45].…”
Section: Context Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, some Finnish teachers believe that the academic competence of poorly achieving students is malleable, yet that of high achieving students is stable [43,44]. Other teachers' beliefs on this issue can be just the reverse [45].…”
Section: Context Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, since we also know that implicit theories influence how teachers interpret social information in the classroom as well as the pedagogical choices they make and that they continuously become communicated to the students (Rattan, Good, and Dweck, 2012;Rissanen, Kuusisto, Hanhimäki, & Tirri, 2016), we also assume that teachers' implicit theories influence their endeavors to teach morality. Subtle cues communicated to students can affect the development of students' implicit theories, which then affects the development of their ethical capabilities.…”
Section: Teachers' Implicit Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Burnette et al's (2013) meta-analysis provides a broad view of the relationship between self-regulation and mindset. However, in addition to quantitative studies, mindset has also been studied with qualitative and mixmethod approaches, yielding valuable information about mindsets in classroom interaction, especially in connection with teachers (see Rissanen, Kuusisto, Hanhimäki, & Tirri, 2016). Thirdly, in previous reviews, mindset has mostly been regarded as an independent variable that predicts the dependent variable, which is achievement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%