2010
DOI: 10.30827/digibug.31943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers' concerns and uncertainties about the introduction of CLIL programmes

Abstract: The implementation of content and language integrated learning (CLIL) means significant changes in the way in which teaching is planned, sequenced and carried out. The adoption of a new curriculum, which integrates linguistic and nonlinguistic material, as well as the linguistic and methodological needs that come with the introduction of this type of teaching, have generated feelings of concern and uncertainty. This paper reports those concerns and uncertainties in the Andalusian context, and strives for clari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, content teachers have an active role in the implementation of the approach in their role as experts in concepts who can certainly contribute to develop language skills in context. In addition to this, results from the present study coincide with Vázquez and Alcalá (2010), which defies to adapt the CLIL curriculum, its didactic units, and the resources themselves to generate success in the implementation of the approach. Likewise, both, this study and Vásquez and Alcalá's (2010) indicate that teachers still place high value on the use of the textbook.…”
Section: Pedagogical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Nevertheless, content teachers have an active role in the implementation of the approach in their role as experts in concepts who can certainly contribute to develop language skills in context. In addition to this, results from the present study coincide with Vázquez and Alcalá (2010), which defies to adapt the CLIL curriculum, its didactic units, and the resources themselves to generate success in the implementation of the approach. Likewise, both, this study and Vásquez and Alcalá's (2010) indicate that teachers still place high value on the use of the textbook.…”
Section: Pedagogical Implicationssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, this major concern regarding their language proficiency does not respond faithfully to the methodological tenets that govern CLIL, since there is a tendency to avoid master classes in which the teacher is the primary source of linguistic input. Rather, CLIL opts for a type of training in which the students take an active role in building their own knowledge (Pavón Vázquez and Rubio 2010). This is why, matching the results of the study conducted by Durán-Martínez and Beltrán-Llavador (2016), the need for language training seems to be relegated to a second place over time and greater importance is attached to methodological training and the design of teaching materials.…”
Section: Plurilingual Education Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of what has been written about CLIL in Spain paints a predominantly positive picture and there appears to be very little research evidencing challenges faced in its implementation but whether this is due to lack of research or lack of challenges is unclear. Although not research-based, Pavón Vázquez & Rubio (2010) recognize three problematic areas in CLIL implementation: structural (organization and sequencing of the curriculum), linguistic (the language level of teachers and students) and attitudinal (particularly on the part of teachers). These are all areas that would merit further research (but see Pérez-Cañado 2016 for a report on research projects into some of these issues).…”
Section: Clilmentioning
confidence: 99%