2018
DOI: 10.1080/14790718.2018.1515206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ beliefs about multilingual pedagogies and the role of initial training

Abstract: The funding information provided (the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad) has been checked against the Open Funder Registry and we found a partial match with "Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad". Please check and resupply the funding details. Response: Resolved AQ6: The funding information provided (Projectes d'Innovació Educativa de la Unitat de Suport Educatiu) has been checked against the Open Funder Registry and we failed to find a match. Please check and resupply the funding details.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
1
6

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
44
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, eight respondents link CLIL with plurilingualism, although S60, for instance, defines it in terms of "mastery of different languages". As shown in a previous work with a similar sample of Valencian Infant and Primary subject teachers-to-be (Portolés & Martí, 2018), this maximal definition of what being multilingual means is rather extended among student teachers and can be attributed to the prevalence of the native speaker construct as the yardstick to measure proficiency in any language (for a discussion of the native-speaker myth, see Davies, 2003;or Llurda, 2009or Llurda, , 2016. The presence of other instances of monolingual ideologies in the form of "the interference fallacy" can be also traced in the worries of ten subjects (four more than in the pretest) about the potential harmful effect of CLIL on the students' L1(s).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Related To Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Besides, eight respondents link CLIL with plurilingualism, although S60, for instance, defines it in terms of "mastery of different languages". As shown in a previous work with a similar sample of Valencian Infant and Primary subject teachers-to-be (Portolés & Martí, 2018), this maximal definition of what being multilingual means is rather extended among student teachers and can be attributed to the prevalence of the native speaker construct as the yardstick to measure proficiency in any language (for a discussion of the native-speaker myth, see Davies, 2003;or Llurda, 2009or Llurda, , 2016. The presence of other instances of monolingual ideologies in the form of "the interference fallacy" can be also traced in the worries of ten subjects (four more than in the pretest) about the potential harmful effect of CLIL on the students' L1(s).…”
Section: Results and Discussion Related To Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Multilingual competence of future teachers means that they can reach professional selfeducation in the process of special, linguistic, psychological, professional, ethic, didactic, historical and methodological training [12,13,14,15]. An experiment was conducted with the aim to study how national Kazakh traditions help to form multilingual competence of future teachers in universities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, in spite of the school claiming to foster multilingual education, both in FL and CLIL classrooms a monolingual approach towards language teaching and learning is observed. This also suggests the need to train teachers in multilingual pedagogies (Portolés & Martí, 2018;Safont, 2017), pointing out the benefits of using different languages in the classroom.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%