Teachers’ beliefs about child participation in Grade R

Abstract

<p>The focus of this paper is to examine teachers’ beliefs about child participation in Grade R. Five Grade R teachers working with children between the ages of five and six participated in this study. Participants were interviewed about their epistemological beliefs on teaching and learning in Grade R and specifically the role of child participation in development at this grade level. Data were analysed deductively using typologies by Perry and Rokeach. The findings of this study showed that these teachers’ beliefs concerning child participation were complex, ‘messy’, context-bound and did not fall neatly into one category. Teachers’ views were multidimensional: primitive, dualistic, derived, multiplistic or relative. Teachers drew from different sources of experience and their own knowing to shape their thinking about children’s participatory roles in the Grade R experience and implementation of child participation. The findings show how teachers’ beliefs were influenced by issues of background, tradition, power and voice.</p><p><strong>Keywords: </strong>teacher beliefs; Grade R; child participation</p>

Grade R teachers’ understanding of reflective practice

“…Pollard (2014) expanded the theory of reflective practice to consider the teachers' personal values and beliefs about education to support professional development. Reflective practice has also been identified by a number of researchers as a mechanism that can support and enable quality teaching and learning (Brown et al 2017;Excell & Linington 2010;Killen 2015;Rousseau 2015;Shaik 2016). Reflective practice is the process that a teacher uses to give thought to the way he or she teaches and how it benefits the learners.…”

Teachers’ Philosophies on Literacy Teaching and Learning in Five Rural Primary Schools in the Western Cape-George District

“…Considering such a global assessment of pedagogic elements in the classroom is at present broadly defined as inclusive education (White Paper 6). Shaik (2016) believes that "there is a strong link between teachers' personal beliefs and the influence they have on their teaching practice".…”

Investigating Learner Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback in a Thai Higher Education Context

“…In this regard, an initial sample size of no more than ten participants is recommended for an interview study based on Creswell and Creswell's (2018) and Dörnyei's (2007) experience. The sample size is also justified in light of previous studies (Al-Bakri, 2016;Shaik, 2016;Uzuntiryaki et al, 2010;Vásquez & Harvey, 2010), which used sample sizes ranging from five to ten interviewees. In order to examine the background of the findings in greater depth, a poststudy interview was conducted with 10 percent (n = 10) of the participants depending on their low and high grades received in previous English courses.…”