Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education of children with ASD: A review of Russian and foreign research

Abstract

Introduction. Contemporary psychological and pedagogical studies emphasise that the success of inclusive education of children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) depends largely on teachers’ readiness and ability to understand students’ with ASD specific needs and take them into account when implementing learning technologies. Thus, it is extremely important to investigate teachers’ attitudes towards educational inclusion of students with autism and identify factors, which may facilitate or hinder teachers’ readiness to work with this category of students in an inclusive format.Aim. On the basis of an analytical review of Russian and foreign academic publications, the aims of the research were the following: to identify and specify the attitudes of teachers to the educational education of children with ASD; to reveal the factors that determine educators’ readiness to teach children with ASD.Methodology and research methods. The theoretical and methodological framework of the research involves social and psychological concepts of an inclusive culture formation in the society. The authors used the methods of theoretical and comparative analysis, systematisation and generalisation of research publications and materials concerning the origins of stereotypical views of different social groups towards children with autism and the problems of professional training of teachers to work in the conditions of inclusion.Results and scientific novelty. The teachers’ attitudes towards children with ASD are highlighted and described on the basis of a complete and complex review of academic publications, which was undertaken for the first time. The authors identify the reasons for positive attitude towards this kind of inclusion and barriers preventing the perception of students with autism as full participants in the educational process. The rejection of idea concerning the possibility and effectiveness of mutual learning of schoolchildren with normative development and with ASD results from the teachers’ characteristics (lack of awareness about the heterogeneity of autism and its manifestations, uncertainty in own forces and abilities to interact with children with expressed emotional and behavioural disorders) and from the lack of methodological and advisory assistance, including the absence of support by an interdisciplinary team of specialists. The age and profile of teachers’ professional activities may also be influenced by the willingness to work in the conditions of inclusion with children with ASD. The recommendations for change in negative attitudes of general education school teachers to the discussed type of inclusion are proposed.Practical significance. The research results can be used to develop a set of measures for improving the inclusive culture of teachers and eliminate their skepticism about teaching in mainstream educational institutions for children with ASD. Moreover, the present findings might help to design specific technologies for interaction with children both in the educational context and in the widest range of social situations.

Achievements and Challenges of Autism Support System in Russia: A Multidimensional Stakeholder Survey

“…It reveals that, while some substantial progress has been made in autism treatment and promoting the system of special education services for children with ASD and their families, the providers and professionals in general social services are much less prepared to deal with specific problems of autistic individuals. These findings concur with the results of previous studies of teachers training in dealing with students with special needs (Aysina et al, 2020) and quality of medical services provided to the children with ASD (Piskunov et al, 2018).…”

Blended Learning Environments in Inclusive Education at the University

“…At the same time, Sweden has undergone significant changes over the past two decades. These changes are within the neoliberal philosophy, emphasizing decentralization, marketing (guided by the principles of cost containment and efficiency), competition, standardization, individual choice and rights, the development of new profiles within specific school units and other factors that potentially work against values such as diversity, justice, and inclusiveness [18].…”

“…Guaranteed inclusion in higher education protects the rights of students who have certain disabilities [17]. Complexity, multidimensionality, and problematic nature of inclusive education might not be ignored until a person faces its practical consequences [18]. Inclusive education has become a global movement due to an increased advocacy for children's educational equality mainly for students who are viewed by educational systems as different [19].…”

Building foundational digital competencies of teachers in general and inclusive education

“…Many works are dedicated to issues of training teachers for inclusive education. In her doctoral thesis Muller (2019) writes that the issues of training future teachers are explored by Aysina, Nesterova, Suslova, & Khitryuk (2020) and Cherkasova (2012), and the issues of training practicing teachers in the system of additional professional education are studied by Karynbaeva, Shapovalova, Shklyar, Emelyanova, & Borisova (2019). We agree with the point of view of Voronina (2018) that building and evaluating digital competencies of teachers should be done constantly on all stages of building these competencies, taking into account educational needs of learners and, primarily, the professional and personal characteristics of each teacher.…”