2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers as memory makers: Testimony in the making of a new history in South Africa

Abstract: This article examines the use of testimony in the making of a new history in South Africa, situating this phenomenon in the context of public construction of memory and identifying history teachers as critical to the process. Through an ethnographic study of sixteen schools that illuminates the use of teacher testimony in Cape Town history classrooms, the authors explore the nuanced use of testimony as a pedagogic tool and probe the role of history teachers as memory makers. Finally, this article assesses impl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While discussing fractional issues in educational settings might at first appear at cross-purposes with nationalistic educational projects, addressing such conflicts may actually contribute to breaking down barriers between archaeologists and publics. Education is a potential locus for building social trust (Cole and Barsalou 2006), but endeavors such as the search for an 'African' or even 'South African' voice potentially overlook more marginal voices (Grundlingh 2004:212), particularly when many educators can rectify perceived narrative discrepancies with their own testimony and thus highlight omissions (Dryden-Peterson and Siebörger 2006). Offering alternatives to nationally sanctioned narratives does not reproduce the old division between discipline and public, but rather realizes the potential for archaeology as a space of debate and reinterpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While discussing fractional issues in educational settings might at first appear at cross-purposes with nationalistic educational projects, addressing such conflicts may actually contribute to breaking down barriers between archaeologists and publics. Education is a potential locus for building social trust (Cole and Barsalou 2006), but endeavors such as the search for an 'African' or even 'South African' voice potentially overlook more marginal voices (Grundlingh 2004:212), particularly when many educators can rectify perceived narrative discrepancies with their own testimony and thus highlight omissions (Dryden-Peterson and Siebörger 2006). Offering alternatives to nationally sanctioned narratives does not reproduce the old division between discipline and public, but rather realizes the potential for archaeology as a space of debate and reinterpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of oral history narratives, teachers became creators of knowledge, by relating their own experiences, told from their own point of view. The teacher testimonies became the focal point of dialogic and interpretive classroom practice (Dryden-Petersen & Siebörger, 2006). The approach served to counter apartheid-era historical narratives, and facilitated interpretive perspectives.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, one significant discussion of the concept relates to Holocaust education, in which the testifier is a survivor of genocide rather than the regular teacher (see Simon and Eppert, , p. 179). Another theme deals with teachers offering their lived experience of life under apartheid in South Africa, using ‘testimony—to engage students in interpretive acts and to create spaces for the practice of dialogue and dissent’ (Dryden‐Peterson and Siebo, , p. 395). Both of these deal with first‐hand testimony rather than with the notion of the teacher as part of a testimonial chain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%