2020
DOI: 10.1080/0020739x.2020.1733686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher support for argumentation and the incorporation of contingencies in mathematics classrooms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the two cases studied (Soledad and Ángeles), we selected 10 episodes that met two criteria: the students perform a relevant action belonging to the mathematical modelling cycle and the teacher participates in the students' interaction. The episodes were analyzed considering teacher support actions associated with an argumentative orchestration (Solar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From the two cases studied (Soledad and Ángeles), we selected 10 episodes that met two criteria: the students perform a relevant action belonging to the mathematical modelling cycle and the teacher participates in the students' interaction. The episodes were analyzed considering teacher support actions associated with an argumentative orchestration (Solar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, collective argumentation requires teacher support because specific actions can strengthen different steps in students' argumentative processes (Yackel, 2002). This support can be provided through teacher actions or questions (Conner et al, 2014) or specialized methods to promote argumentation such as argumentative orchestration (Solar et al, 2021). This support for collective argumentation comprises a variety of resources and strategies: first, mathematical tasks open to discussion that require a variety of resolution strategies or allow for various positions in order to promote debate among students; second, communicative strategies such as the encouragement of participation, dealing with errors, and deliberate questions (Solar & Deulofeu, 2016); third, strategies for recognizing students' thinking, which include the teacher's elicitation and acknowledgment of thinking patterns in their students (Ball et al, 2009).…”
Section: Teacher Support For Argumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations