2013
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2013.860218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher-reported effects of the Playing-2-gether intervention on child externalising problem behaviour

Abstract: This longitudinal study examines the teacher-perceived effect of a school-based intervention (i.e. Playing-2-gether) targeting teacher-child interactions to reduce externalising problem behaviour (EPB) amongst preschoolers. Boys with the highest score for EPB in the classroom and their teacher participated in the study. Teacher-child dyads (N = 175) from 46 schools were randomly assigned to an intervention or a control (i.e. education as usual) condition. Teacher-rated questionnaires were collected before, dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that although this moderator significantly predicted the effect size between studies, there was only a trend for this moderator within studies. Nevertheless, it seems important that prevention programs aimed at improving teacher–child interactions pay enough attention to the interactions with specific children and not only to the overall interactions (e.g., banking time, Playing2gether; Driscoll & Pianta, 2010; Vancraeyveldt, Verschueren, Van Craeyevelt, Wouters, & Colpin, 2015). Teachers should also attempt to spend enough time and energy in getting to know their students and the individual needs of the different students in order to maintain adequate relationships with each of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that although this moderator significantly predicted the effect size between studies, there was only a trend for this moderator within studies. Nevertheless, it seems important that prevention programs aimed at improving teacher–child interactions pay enough attention to the interactions with specific children and not only to the overall interactions (e.g., banking time, Playing2gether; Driscoll & Pianta, 2010; Vancraeyveldt, Verschueren, Van Craeyevelt, Wouters, & Colpin, 2015). Teachers should also attempt to spend enough time and energy in getting to know their students and the individual needs of the different students in order to maintain adequate relationships with each of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our sample consisted of 175 preschool children (all boys) and their 175 teachers from 46 mainstream schools in Flanders, the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium (Vancraeyveldt, Verschueren, Van Craeyevelt, Wouters, & Colpin, 2013). These boys were in either the second or third preschool group (aged 3 to 5 years) and were on average 4 years and 9 months old (SD = 7 months).…”
Section: Methods Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance model fit, we also included autoregressive paths from Time 1 to Time 3 for all variables in each model. Because our data were derived from an intervention study (Vancraeyveldt et al, 2013), we controlled for condition (0 = control condition, 1 = intervention condition) in all models by estimating paths from condition to all other variables in the model. For reasons of clarity, the path coefficients for this covariate are presented in a separate table (see Table 2).…”
Section: Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banking Time has primarily been applied in preschool research, but its principles are also incorporated in interventions for older children, for example in secondary education (Duong et al, 2019). In some interventions, Banking Time is combined with an intervention component that targets teachers' behavior management skills (McIntosh et al, 2000;Vancraeyveldt et al, 2015). Banking Time interventions have shown mixed effects.…”
Section: Second and Third Decadementioning
confidence: 99%