“…Methodological issues aside from scale and duration have further constrained the impact of PD initiatives on teachers' understanding; these include variable degree of take-up and failure to consider potentially confounding factors (Hennessy & Davies, 2020). Studies with (quasi-)experimental designs commonly approach evaluation of interventions by striving for 'implementation fidelity'.…”
Section: Professional Learning Approaches For Supporting Dialoguementioning
Research indicating the educational value of classroom dialogue, in which participants engage critically and constructively with other perspectives, is long established but classroom practice evolves slowly. Outcomes of practitioner professional development in this area are inconsistent and often dependent on costly, external input. Our study aimed to understand whether and how practitionerled inquiry may offer an alternative, sustainable and scalable way of developing dialogic practices, characterising effective organisational models. The Teacher Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (T-SEDA) resource pack was designed to support iterative cycles of practitioner inquiry based on systematic analysis of classroom dialogue and reflecting critically with peers, using customisable coding tools and templates. This open resource embeds research findings about dialogue forms that are productive for student learning. We report our design-based research comprising nested inquiry cycles involving 74 practitioners from early years to tertiary levels. Data were derived from surveys, inquiry reports and interviews. Participants successfully used and adapted the resources for their own goals, needs and diverse contexts across seven countries. The largely autonomous process was typically supported by local facilitators working with groups of practitioners; data analysis focused on illuminating models of institutional organisation of inquiry, uses of T-SEDA resources, participant perceptions and factors underlying (dis)engagement. The findings offer insights into knowledge mobilisation and educational change processes. They yield design principles for scalability and sustainability based on a non-prescriptive model of local ownership and facilitation of self-directed practitioner inquiry and purpose-driven adaptation in complex educational circumstances.
“…Methodological issues aside from scale and duration have further constrained the impact of PD initiatives on teachers' understanding; these include variable degree of take-up and failure to consider potentially confounding factors (Hennessy & Davies, 2020). Studies with (quasi-)experimental designs commonly approach evaluation of interventions by striving for 'implementation fidelity'.…”
Section: Professional Learning Approaches For Supporting Dialoguementioning
Research indicating the educational value of classroom dialogue, in which participants engage critically and constructively with other perspectives, is long established but classroom practice evolves slowly. Outcomes of practitioner professional development in this area are inconsistent and often dependent on costly, external input. Our study aimed to understand whether and how practitionerled inquiry may offer an alternative, sustainable and scalable way of developing dialogic practices, characterising effective organisational models. The Teacher Scheme for Educational Dialogue Analysis (T-SEDA) resource pack was designed to support iterative cycles of practitioner inquiry based on systematic analysis of classroom dialogue and reflecting critically with peers, using customisable coding tools and templates. This open resource embeds research findings about dialogue forms that are productive for student learning. We report our design-based research comprising nested inquiry cycles involving 74 practitioners from early years to tertiary levels. Data were derived from surveys, inquiry reports and interviews. Participants successfully used and adapted the resources for their own goals, needs and diverse contexts across seven countries. The largely autonomous process was typically supported by local facilitators working with groups of practitioners; data analysis focused on illuminating models of institutional organisation of inquiry, uses of T-SEDA resources, participant perceptions and factors underlying (dis)engagement. The findings offer insights into knowledge mobilisation and educational change processes. They yield design principles for scalability and sustainability based on a non-prescriptive model of local ownership and facilitation of self-directed practitioner inquiry and purpose-driven adaptation in complex educational circumstances.
“…Will teachers gravitate back to their former ways of teaching? Doubts about the long-term impacts of TPD were explicitly expressed by Hennessy and Davies (2020). These authors also hypothesized three general reasons that limit the impact of TPD: (1) the complex change in teaching is too demanding for the teachers, and they do not develop all the needed abilities during the training time; (2) the shift from traditional practice is not trivial, requiring a change of teacher mindset, which does not always happen during the TPD; and (3) teachers do not really believe in what they were taught during TPD; they do not find it sufficiently informative, persuasive, nor valuable.…”
Section: Teacher Development Programs As a Tool For Delivering Dialogic Teaching To Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sustainability of dialogic teaching practices was examined by Hennessy et al (2018), who reported observing two teachers who continued using a dialogic approach ten weeks after they completed a TPD program (see also Hennessy & Davies, 2020). More elaborated findings were published by Osborne et al (2019), who conducted a TPD program to enhance elementary teachers' ability to engage their students with argumentation in science.…”
Section: Teacher Development Programs As a Tool For Delivering Dialogic Teaching To Classroomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last obstacle against the sustainability of dialogic teaching identified by Hennessy & Davies (2020) is the distrust in this approach. Even when teachers complete TPD on dialogic teaching, they do not necessarily lose the need to be persuaded about the benefits of this approach.…”
This study deals with the question of whether a change in classroom discourse implemented through teacher professional development (TPD) is sustainable over time. I studied one teacher’s practices and thinking three years after completing a TPD programme focused on dialogic teaching. The data were collected through interviews with the teacher and video recordings of her lessons. The data showed that the teacher continued with dialogic teaching, but she appropriated and modified the concept of dialogic teaching to serve her own needs and preferences. The way the teacher overcame obstacles to sustaining the implemented change is discussed in the study.
“…The chapter places particular emphasis on the ways in which the PD program was informed by the literature on teacher professional learning and effective features of PD, as well as the literature on promoting dialogic pedagogy. The literature on PD promoting dialogic pedagogy reports varied success (Hennessy and Davies 2019). Examining how PD programs can be informed more closely by the theory on teacher professional learning can contribute to this issue.…”
Effective teacher professional development (PD) is an important part of successfully implementing educational innovations. However, research has shown that not all PD is effective, largely because it has not been developed based on theoretical understandings around teacher professional learning, such as reflective practice, teacher collaboration and teacher agency and inquiry. This chapter concerns the PD program developed as part of the DIALLS project. The chapter places particular emphasis on the ways in which the PD program was informed by the literature on teacher professional learning and effective features of PD, as well as the literature on promoting dialogic pedagogy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.