1992
DOI: 10.1177/0022487192043003006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Mentoring and Teacher Retention

Abstract: Four years after their initial, mentored teaching year, two cohorts of beginning teachers (N= 160) were surveyed to determine whether they had remained in teaching and their retrospective attitudes about mentoring. Approximately 96% of those located were still teaching. Of the different types of support they received from their mentors, they most valued emotional support. It is suggested that teacher mentoring may reduce the early attrition of beginning teachers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
88
1
4

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
88
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Thirty-two percent of the traditionally certified teachers rated a mentor program as not important, as did 28% of the alternatively certified teachers. This finding stands in contrast to the conclusions reached by Kirby and LeBude (1998) and Odell and Ferraro (1992), who emphasized, based on their research findings, the retention-enhancing value of providing a mentor teacher during the first years of a new teacher's career. The present study did not probe the reasons for respondents' lack of enthusiasm for mentors, but it may be that those responding "not important" found a previous mentoring experience not helpful, or, because they had prior non-CTE teaching experience, may have viewed a mentor as not important or not critical to remaining in the profession.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thirty-two percent of the traditionally certified teachers rated a mentor program as not important, as did 28% of the alternatively certified teachers. This finding stands in contrast to the conclusions reached by Kirby and LeBude (1998) and Odell and Ferraro (1992), who emphasized, based on their research findings, the retention-enhancing value of providing a mentor teacher during the first years of a new teacher's career. The present study did not probe the reasons for respondents' lack of enthusiasm for mentors, but it may be that those responding "not important" found a previous mentoring experience not helpful, or, because they had prior non-CTE teaching experience, may have viewed a mentor as not important or not critical to remaining in the profession.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Employing a mentoring program can reduce early attrition of beginning teachers (Odell & Ferraro, 1992). For the purpose of this study, mentoring is defined as an "intense caring relationship in which persons with more experience work with less experienced persons to promote both professional and personal development" (Caffarella, 1992, p. 38).…”
Section: Teacher Attrition and Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-service teachers recognized the strengths of their cooperating teachers and worked with them accordingly. This is in keeping with the literature that indicates that student teachers value the support mentors provide (Booth, 1993;Odell & Ferraro, 1992;Perlberg & Theodor, 1975). Barbara felt that her cooperating teacher was honest and gave her constructive criticisms.…”
Section: Experiencing Relationshipssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Tutorial system originated from the undergraduate tutorial system of University of Oxford in Fourteenth Century [1], which purpose is to find ways to approach students, actively communicate with them, effectively solve their problems in life and study, and meet their reasonable needs in the course of their development so that they can finish their studies successfully [2]. Tutorial system has always been one of the most proud institutions in University of Oxford.…”
Section: The Origin and Development Of Tutorial Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%