Proceedings of the 11th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing Education 2016
DOI: 10.1145/2978249.2978266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Feedback on Delivering Computational Thinking in Primary School

Abstract: We report on the preliminary results of an ongoing study examining the teaching of new primary school topics based on Computational Thinking in New Zealand. We analyse detailed feedback from 13 teachers participating in the study, who had little or no previous experience teaching computer science and related topics. From this we extract key themes identified by the teachers that are likely to be encountered deploying a new curriculum, including unexpected opportunities for cross-curricula learning, development… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising given research suggesting special education teachers are already asked to do so in terms of roles and responsibilities, which many contribute to being one of the reasons special education teachers leave the field (Hagaman & Casey, 2018). The reflections further highlight the mix of feelings preservice teachers may feel regarding CT/CS based on their confidence level and general understanding of computing ideas (Bell et al, 2016; Cateté et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This is not surprising given research suggesting special education teachers are already asked to do so in terms of roles and responsibilities, which many contribute to being one of the reasons special education teachers leave the field (Hagaman & Casey, 2018). The reflections further highlight the mix of feelings preservice teachers may feel regarding CT/CS based on their confidence level and general understanding of computing ideas (Bell et al, 2016; Cateté et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Through either route students train to teach a broad range of subjects since primary teachers are normally expected teach across most subjects in the curriculum to their class, although within the training programme they would normally would have the opportunity to specialise. On all routes, student teachers spend a minimum of 24 weeks in school (DfE, n.d.) Although primary teachers would appear to be in a strong position to teach integrated engineering projects because they normally teach across all areas of the curriculum (Pope, 2019) a frequently cited barrier to doing this is PSTs' lack of content knowledge, not only in engineering but in the actual STEM subjects they are training to teach, such as technology (Avsec and Sajdera, 2019;Bencze, 2010;Lee et al 2020;McRobbie et al 2000), science (Radloff and Capobianco, 2019) and computing (Bell et al 2016). This leaves them feeling unprepared to teach engineering (Bir et al 2017;Coppola, 2019), despite their awareness of its importance (Bir et al 2017;Kurup et al 2019;Margot and Kettler, 2019).…”
Section: Pre-service Primary Teachers' Preparation For Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CT includes thought processes such as abstraction, algorithms, troubleshooting and debugging, pattern recognition, problem decomposition and simulations and it has been suggested that engineering design and CT can be complementary (Ehsan et al 2020). But again, many primary teachers will lack relevant expertise to teach the subject confidently (Bell et al 2016) or equate computing with technology (Lee et al 2020).…”
Section: Pre-service Primary Teachers' Preparation For Engineering Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, growing attention has been given to integrating programming instruction in elementary school (Allsop, 2019;Bell, Duncan, et al, 2016;Bell, Witten, et al, 2016;Duncan et al, 2017). For example, Hainey and colleagues (2019) utilized a novel approach called games-based construction learning (GBCL) to teach programming concepts in upper elementary school.…”
Section: Programming Learning At An Early Agementioning
confidence: 99%