2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-013-9361-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Enactment Patterns: How Can We Help Move All Teachers to Reform-Based Inquiry Practice Through Professional Development?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are consistent with prior findings associated with the use of the employed professional development system (Lotter et al, 2013;Rushton et al, 2011;Singer, Lotter, Feller, & Gates, 2011) Rushton et al (2011 and Lotter et al (2013) employed a similar professional development system working with high school chemistry and biology teachers while Singer et al (2011) worked with middle school science teachers. Rushton et al (2011) reported that the combination of the morning content and the practice teaching sessions played a significant impact for shifting the instructional practices of the participating high school chemistry teachers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are consistent with prior findings associated with the use of the employed professional development system (Lotter et al, 2013;Rushton et al, 2011;Singer, Lotter, Feller, & Gates, 2011) Rushton et al (2011 and Lotter et al (2013) employed a similar professional development system working with high school chemistry and biology teachers while Singer et al (2011) worked with middle school science teachers. Rushton et al (2011) reported that the combination of the morning content and the practice teaching sessions played a significant impact for shifting the instructional practices of the participating high school chemistry teachers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In addition, teachers may have a compartmentalized understanding of science that interferes with innovation (Roehrig & Luft, 2004) and often view inquiry as a de-contextualized collection of isolated process skills as opposed to an array of interconnected processes (Lee, Hart, Cuevas, & Engers, 2004). As a result, design-or inquiry-based instruction is often equated with ''hands-on'' or ''real-world'' activities that are unconnected to meaningful scientific ideas (Lotter, Rushton, & Singer, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considerando o âmbito do conhecimento pedagógico, os licenciandos demonstraram concepções que incluem elementos importantes dos pressupostos socioconstrutivistas para o EnCI (Carvalho, 2013;Windschitl, 2002). O fato de 82,6% reconhecerem que o EnCI possibilita o protagonismo dos estudantes, somado às menções sobre promover a motivação e construção coletiva do conhecimento e, de forma mais modesta, a consideração dos conhecimentos prévios dos estudantes e a regulação da aprendizagem, configura a presença de uma concepção de aprendizagem centrada no aprendiz em contraposição à visão centrada no professor (Lotter, Rushton, & Singer, 2013;Voet & De Wever, 2016). Esse dado indica que os licenciandos visualizam o EnCI como uma forma de concretizar os princípios socioconstrutivistas, superando uma dificuldade recorrente para os professores de forma geral que é compreender e visualizar um modelo de ensino que tenha uma orientação centrada no estudante (Windschitl, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…As one moves across the continuum, the number of participants increases and the network of interactions broadens (Windschitl, 2002). Windschitl's Framework has been used in numerous studies on constructivist pedagogy (Cushion, 2013;Suurtamm & Koch, 2014), implementation of inquiry in science instruction (Lotter, Rushton, & Singer, 2013), and in understanding teachers' resistance to organizational change (Orlando, 2014). It has also been used to study teacher-educators construction of pedagogy in response to external, often conflicting, mandates (Tillema & Kremer-Hayon, 2005).…”
Section: Description Of the Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%