2001
DOI: 10.1177/001440290106800101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Decision Making in Participation of Students with Disabilities in Large-Scale Assessment

Abstract: This article reports on the findings of a study to test the effectiveness of an intervention with teachers and administrators to improve decision making regarding participation and accommodation for students with disabilities in large-scale assessments. Using a pretest/posttest, multiple measures design involving more than 80 teachers, the study assessed the impact of training on teacher's knowledge and confidence about participation and accommodation, accommodation decisions for hypothetical students, and act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is surprising given that differentiating instruction benefits all learners, not just students with disabilities. Furthermore, teachers report that their confidence levels are increased when they are exposed to techniques that address inclusion in the classroom (Destefano, Shriner, & Lloyd, 2001). Unfortunately, based on this review, very few courses are dedicated to this topic.…”
Section: Differentiating Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is surprising given that differentiating instruction benefits all learners, not just students with disabilities. Furthermore, teachers report that their confidence levels are increased when they are exposed to techniques that address inclusion in the classroom (Destefano, Shriner, & Lloyd, 2001). Unfortunately, based on this review, very few courses are dedicated to this topic.…”
Section: Differentiating Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One critical problem revealed by studies like that of Gibson et al is that IEP teams often make questionable decisions about accommodations. This problem is discussed at some length by Hollenbeck (this issue), who refers to earlier similar findings by DeStefano, Shriner, and Lloyd (2001), Fuchs and Fuchs (2001), and Helwig and Tindal (2003). This problem is particularly disturbing because the IEP team plays an essential role in making accommodation decisions for state and local assessments.…”
Section: Functions Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For many years, students with disabilities were not included in efforts to implement higher standards and more stringent measures of achievement (DeStefano, Shriner, & Lloyd, 2001). The focus of special education has traditionally been on meeting the Individualized Education Program (IEP) goals and not on district or statewide goals.…”
Section: Curriculum-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, IDEA 1997 required these students to participate in state and district assessments with accommodations when appropriate. Alternative assessments may be used for students with more severe disabilities who are unable to participate in general statewide assessments (DeStefano et al, 2001;Shriner, 2000;. In short, school systems are now accountable for the education of all students (Thurlow, 1998 Approximately 50% of all states have or will soon have exit or certification exams that high school students have to pass to receive a diploma (Education Commission of the States, 2000).…”
Section: Curriculum-basedmentioning
confidence: 99%