2003
DOI: 10.1080/00909880305379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teacher Access and Mentoring Abilities: Predicting the Outcome Value of Extra Class Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They note that while many faculty members make themselves available to students outside of class through established office hours, students by and large do not take advantage of this interaction opportunity. Bippus, Kearney, Plax, and Brooks (2003) cite similar findings and note the missed opportunities for faculty to mentor students. Thus, while holding office hours may be considered a required part of a faculty member's role (and may, in fact, be a contractual obligation), the benefits of such an approach in a traditional setting are uncertain.…”
Section: Virtual Office Hours As a Connecting Threadsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…They note that while many faculty members make themselves available to students outside of class through established office hours, students by and large do not take advantage of this interaction opportunity. Bippus, Kearney, Plax, and Brooks (2003) cite similar findings and note the missed opportunities for faculty to mentor students. Thus, while holding office hours may be considered a required part of a faculty member's role (and may, in fact, be a contractual obligation), the benefits of such an approach in a traditional setting are uncertain.…”
Section: Virtual Office Hours As a Connecting Threadsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Teachers may increase their immediacy in an effort to impress upon their students that they are receptive to extra-class interactions. While it is important for faculty to be both physically and psychologically accessible to students (Bippus, Kearney, Plax, & Brooks, 2003;Wilson, Woods, & Gaff, 1974), they must be careful not to counteract their accessibility by using excessive levels of immediacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Waldeck (2006) reported that one possible dimension of personalized education involves students and teachers engaging in social exchanges and reciprocal self-disclosure*two characteristics of the extra-class communication variable elucidated by Fusani (1994) and Bippus, Kearney, Plax, and Brooks (2003). In other words, part of the answer to the question, ''What is personalized education?''…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…might already exist in the form of published instructional communication theory and research which could benefit administrators and faculty in their efforts to answer the question and create personalized experiences for students. Thus, a second goal of this study involved investigating the relationships and possible conceptual overlap among personalized education and other instructional communication variables, including immediacy (Rodriguez, Plax, & Kearney, 1996;Richmond, Gorham, & McCroskey, 1987), mentoring (Waldeck, Orrego, Plax, & Kearney, 1997), and extra-class communication (Bippus et al, 2003;Fusani, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%