The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.3037070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TDSSC: A Three-Directions Spectral–Spatial Convolution Neural Network for Hyperspectral Image Change Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…GETNET [6] can obtain the second best performance on Barbara dataset, but it cannot get satisfactory accuracy on Bay data. By contrast, TDSSC [20] can achieve relatively stable accuracy on these two datasets as it captures more robust feature representation by fusing the features of spectral direction and two spatial directions. For the proposed ASSCDN, spectral and spatial features are fused adaptively for different patches, which is helpful to obtain more reliable detection results.…”
Section: Results and Comparison On Barbara And Bay Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…GETNET [6] can obtain the second best performance on Barbara dataset, but it cannot get satisfactory accuracy on Bay data. By contrast, TDSSC [20] can achieve relatively stable accuracy on these two datasets as it captures more robust feature representation by fusing the features of spectral direction and two spatial directions. For the proposed ASSCDN, spectral and spatial features are fused adaptively for different patches, which is helpful to obtain more reliable detection results.…”
Section: Results and Comparison On Barbara And Bay Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we tested the performance of the proposed ASSCDN on three real public available HSI datasets. Moreover, to verify the superiority of the proposed ASS-CDN, eight approaches are selected for comparison, including four widely used methods: CVA [61], KNN, SVM, and RCVA [39], and four deep learning-based methods: DCVA [50], DSFA [51], GETNET [6], and TDSSC [20]. Furthermore, five metrics (OA, KC, F1, PRE, and REC) are exploited to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed ASSCDN and the compared methods.…”
Section: Comparison Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations