2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.09.942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TCT-92 Comparison of Procedural, Safety, and Efficacy Outcomes of Watchman FLX Versus Watchman 2.5

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the PINNACLE FLX clinical trial of 400 patients receiving the WATCHMAN FLX, noted stroke rates of 0.7% at 45 days (compared with 0.57% early stroke rate in our study), other more recently published retrospective studies have shown lower rates of strokes, leaks, devicerelated thrombosis, and complication associated with the WATCHMAN FLX compared with the older WATCHMAN 2.5 device. [18][19][20]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the PINNACLE FLX clinical trial of 400 patients receiving the WATCHMAN FLX, noted stroke rates of 0.7% at 45 days (compared with 0.57% early stroke rate in our study), other more recently published retrospective studies have shown lower rates of strokes, leaks, devicerelated thrombosis, and complication associated with the WATCHMAN FLX compared with the older WATCHMAN 2.5 device. [18][19][20]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%