2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TCT-840 Gender Specific Analysis Of The Randomized ISAR-CLOSURE Trial: The Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 A recent large randomized trial comparing vascular closure devices (VCDs) to manual compression showed that VCDs were noninferior to manual compression in terms of vascular access site complications and reduced the time to hemostasis. 5 They were also shown to reduce time to ambulation, time to hemostasis, and patient comfort compared to manual compression. 6 There are several techniques for vascular access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 A recent large randomized trial comparing vascular closure devices (VCDs) to manual compression showed that VCDs were noninferior to manual compression in terms of vascular access site complications and reduced the time to hemostasis. 5 They were also shown to reduce time to ambulation, time to hemostasis, and patient comfort compared to manual compression. 6 There are several techniques for vascular access.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to manual compression, they have been shown to facilitate earlier discharges, improve patient comfort and reduce puncture site complications. [1][2][3][4][5] Their use in the clinical setting has become common practice, especially with the rise in volume and complexity of interventional work. Reports in the literature have demonstrated their ability to allow earlier patient mobilisation and reduce the need for prolonged manual compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports in the literature have demonstrated their ability to allow earlier patient mobilisation and reduce the need for prolonged manual compression. [1][2][3][4][5] These devices first emerged in the mid-1990s, and since then, a variety of VCDs have gained approval for diagnostic and interventional procedures. 5 Each achieves haemostasis through a different mechanism of action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%