Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2021
DOI: 10.23855/preslia.2021.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of the Rubus gothicus group in south-eastern central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second possible explanation is that the tetraploid records from Central Germany are wrong. Third, a cytotype turnover (i.e., a replacement of one cytotype by another due to selective pressure), as observed for example by Trávníček et al. (2010) in Vicia cracca L., could also explain the observed discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A second possible explanation is that the tetraploid records from Central Germany are wrong. Third, a cytotype turnover (i.e., a replacement of one cytotype by another due to selective pressure), as observed for example by Trávníček et al. (2010) in Vicia cracca L., could also explain the observed discrepancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of each cytotype observed in a population at one point in time only captures an instant of the inter-and intra-cytotype dynamics, yet the intricate processes resulting in one or the other type dominating or coexistence ultimately unfold over many generations. Temporal monitoring of perennial mixed-cytotype populations is rare, with the single set of long-term population surveys revealing stable cytotype frequencies over a 40-year timespan (Trávníček et al 2010). The paucity of systems with temporal surveys is likely due to the tedious nature of quantifying ploidal level and known extended life-span of multiple cytotype systems (Kolář et al 2017;Van Drunen and Friedman 2022).…”
Section: Population Trajectorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the theoretical expectation of spatial divergence, mixed cytotype populations lacking spatial segregation have been observed in many taxa (as reviewed by Kolář et al 2017). It is unknown if these observations of mixed cytotypes are merely ephemeral 'snapshots' (Levin 1975;Mráz et al 2022); however, persistence of an autotetraploid in natural populations is difficult to monitor, and temporal observations of naturally occurring mixed-ploidy populations are few: for example, a stable perennial system (Vicia cracca (Fabaceae); Trávníček et al 2010) and two systems (annual and mixed life history) which are persistent despite fluctuations in the relative frequency of cytotypes (Centaurea stoebe (Asteraceae) and Tripleurospermum inodorum (Asteraceae) ; Mráz et al 2022;Čertner et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the problem also concerns species within taxonomically problematic and species-rich genera with morphologically similar or cryptic species, such as Rubus, Hieracium, Campanula, Orobanche, Stipa, Oxytropis, etc. (Wolanin et al 2016, 2020Aleksić et al 2018;Piwowarczyk et al 2019;Chen et al 2020;Nobis et al 2020a;Baiakhmetov et al 2021;Kosiński et al 2021;Trávníček et al 2021;Havlíček et al 2022;Szeląg 2022;Vintsek et al 2022;Wang et al 2022;Nobis et al 2023). Globally distributed dandelions (Taraxacum, Asteraceae) can also be included in this group (Uhlemann 2002(Uhlemann , 2016Scott and Rich 2013;Štěpánek and Kirschner 2017;Marciniuk et al 2018;Kirschner et al 2020Kirschner et al , 2022.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%