2016
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4088.2.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of the Proisotoma complex. VI. Mobile forms of Proisotoma s.str. with the description of a new species from East Siberia (Collembola: Isotomidae)

Abstract: Phenotypic dimorphism of four species of the genus Proisotoma s.str. is described. The modified specimens are characterized by protruding corneas of eyes, stronger pigmentation, enlarged and more chitinized furca, and extension of clavate tenent hairs in the distal part of the tibiotarsi. The characteristics of the modified specimens indicate higher mobile activity. Both sexes are affected by the dimorphism, with the "mobile" forms mostly co-occuring during the cold season with normal specimens. Proisotoma dua… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Difficulty arises in deciding “which” morphological traits equate to species, and a wide range of diagnostic morphological characters (chaetotaxy, mouthpart) has been suggested and has greatly improved the taxonomy in many collembolan groups (e.g., Deharveng, ). Further, complicating these decisions is dimorphism phenomena, referred to as ecomorphosis, cyclomorphosis, epitoky, mobile forms and sexual differentiation, and is often discovered within species (Cassagnau & Lauga‐Reyrel, ; Fjellberg, ; Mari‐Mutt, ; Potapov & Bogomolov, ; Skarżyński, , ; Stevens & D'Haese, ). More commonly, many supposed independent species are difficult to separate owing to their conservative or controversial morphology, for example, problematic taxa in Lepidocyrtinae, Tomoceridae, Pseudachorutinae (Deharveng, ) and some based on colour patterns (Jordana & Baquero, ; Yoshii & Suhardjono, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Difficulty arises in deciding “which” morphological traits equate to species, and a wide range of diagnostic morphological characters (chaetotaxy, mouthpart) has been suggested and has greatly improved the taxonomy in many collembolan groups (e.g., Deharveng, ). Further, complicating these decisions is dimorphism phenomena, referred to as ecomorphosis, cyclomorphosis, epitoky, mobile forms and sexual differentiation, and is often discovered within species (Cassagnau & Lauga‐Reyrel, ; Fjellberg, ; Mari‐Mutt, ; Potapov & Bogomolov, ; Skarżyński, , ; Stevens & D'Haese, ). More commonly, many supposed independent species are difficult to separate owing to their conservative or controversial morphology, for example, problematic taxa in Lepidocyrtinae, Tomoceridae, Pseudachorutinae (Deharveng, ) and some based on colour patterns (Jordana & Baquero, ; Yoshii & Suhardjono, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…veca (Wray, 1952), and Cliforga aleghaniensis (Wray, 1952). The published data on other 'ecomorphic species' of the family Isotomidae were summarized by Najt (1983). Four types of ecomorphic modifications were proposed to classify all known cases, based on morphological structures affected by ecomorphosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%