2009
DOI: 10.1002/mmng.200800008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy of Late Jurassic diplodocid sauropods from Tendaguru (Tanzania)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No distinct foramina occur close to the border with the parietal, unlike in Kaatedocus (Tschopp & Mateus, 2013b). The dorsal-most portion of the supraoccipital of SMA 0011 tapers, not forming a distinct dorsal elevation as in Apatosaurus CM 11162 (Berman & McIntosh, 1978), or the indeterminate flagellicaudatan MB.R.2388 (Remes, 2009). …”
Section: Description Of Sma 0011mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…No distinct foramina occur close to the border with the parietal, unlike in Kaatedocus (Tschopp & Mateus, 2013b). The dorsal-most portion of the supraoccipital of SMA 0011 tapers, not forming a distinct dorsal elevation as in Apatosaurus CM 11162 (Berman & McIntosh, 1978), or the indeterminate flagellicaudatan MB.R.2388 (Remes, 2009). …”
Section: Description Of Sma 0011mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The groove is faint and relatively short, not reaching either the anterior or the medial margin. Such a groove was usually interpreted as typical for dicraeosaurids (Remes, 2009; Whitlock, 2011a), but is also present in other diplodocids (Tschopp, Mateus & Benson, 2015). However, a fading out of this feature is uncommon in dicraeosaurids, where the groove is distinct (Janensch, 1935; Remes, 2009).…”
Section: Description Of Sma 0011mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some sauropods, there is a cranial foramen situated between the posterior portion of the parietals and the anterior portion of the supraoccipital. Known as the postparietal foramen, this feature has been inferred as a synapomorphy of Dicraeosauridae (Salgado and Bonaparte, 1991;Harris, 2006a;Remes, 2009;Whitlock, 2011a), an autapomorphy for the plateosaurian sauropodomorphs Massospondylus and Plateosaurus (Knoll et al, 2012), the basal sauropod Spinophorosaurus (Knoll et al, 2012), and the diplodocids Tornieria (Upchurch et al, 2004a;Remes, 2009), Kaatedocus (Tschopp and Mateus, 2013), and Galeamopus (Tschopp et al, 2015). Yet outside of Kaatedocus, Galeamopus, Tornieria, and Suuwassea (Lovelace et al, 2007;Whitlock and Harris, 2010;Whitlock, 2011a;Woodruff and Fowler, 2012), no members of Diplodocidae or other Late Jurassic sauropods are known to possess this cranial feature; however, given the scarcity of sauropod cranial material, it is possible that this feature may be more widespread in Sauropoda (Harris, 2006a;Whitlock and Harris, 2010;Hedrick et al, 2014).…”
Section: Morphologic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Group 1 comprised diplodocids (Tornieria and "Barosaurus"), with the humeri MB . It must be mentioned that "Barosaurus" long bones from Tendaguru most probably belong to more than one diplodocid taxon (Remes 2009), but their close phylogenetic relationship makes it justifiable to use them together for the DFA in a supplementary group. Additionally, the group 3 with Dicraeosauridae comprises different taxa.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%