Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3132847.3133041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomy Induction Using Hypernym Subsequences

Abstract: We propose a novel, semi-supervised approach towards domain taxonomy induction from an input vocabulary of seed terms. Unlike all previous approaches, which typically extract direct hypernym edges for terms, our approach utilizes a novel probabilistic framework to extract hypernym subsequences. Taxonomy induction from extracted subsequences is cast as an instance of the minimumcost flow problem on a carefully designed directed graph. Through experiments, we demonstrate that our approach outperforms stateof-the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Since we don't allow DAG in our setting, we convert its results to trees (denoted by TAXI (tree)) by only keeping the first parent of each node. Sub-Seq (Gupta et al, 2017) also reuses TAXI's hypernym candidates. TaxoRL (Partial) and Tax-oRL (Full) denotes partial induction and full induction, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Since we don't allow DAG in our setting, we convert its results to trees (denoted by TAXI (tree)) by only keeping the first parent of each node. Sub-Seq (Gupta et al, 2017) also reuses TAXI's hypernym candidates. TaxoRL (Partial) and Tax-oRL (Full) denotes partial induction and full induction, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal taxonomy is also found by the MST. Gupta et al (2017) extract hypernym subsequences based on hypernym pairs, and regard the task of taxonomy induction as an instance of the minimum-cost flow problem.…”
Section: Taxonomy Inductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the second hypernymy organization step, most methods formulate it as a graph optimization problem. They first build a noisy hypernymy graph using hypernymy pairs extracted and then derive the output taxonomy as a particular tree or DAG structure (e.g., maximum spanning tree [5,35], optimal branching [49], and minimum-cost flow [14]) from the hypernymy graph. Finally, there are some methods that leverage entity set expansion techniques [40,62] to incrementally construct a taxonomy either from scratch or from a tiny seed taxonomy.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bansal et al [3] build a factor graph to model hypernymy relations and regard taxonomy induction as a structured learning problem, which can be inferred with loop belief propagation. Recently, Gupta et al [9] propose to build the initial graph using hypernym subsequence (instead of single hypernym pair) and model taxonomy induction as a minimum-cost flow problem [26]. Comparing with these methods, our approach leverages the weak supervision in "seed" taxonomy and builds a task-specific taxonomy in which two terms can hold a non-hypernymy relation.…”
Section: Taxonomy Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%