“…Remarks: Our material is identified as a Sicyonis based on a combination of a mesogleal longitudinal musculature in the tentacles (absent in Tealidium Hertwig, 1882; Anthosactis Danielssen, 1890;Paranthus Andres, 1883;Bathydactylus Carlgren, 1928a;Antiparactis Verrill, 1899;Pseudoparactis Stephenson, 1920;Antholoba Hertwig, 1882), unequal development of mesenteries in a pair (absent in Pycnanthus McMurrich, 1893;Hormosoma Stephenson, 1918a;Cnidanthus Carlgren, 1927), absence of b-mastigophores in tentacles (present in Actinostola Verrill, 1883;Stomphia Gosse, 1859), and number and cycles of mesenteries and pseudotentacles present in Ophiodiscus Hertwig, 1882(Carlgren, 1949Fautin, 1984;Rodríguez et al, 2008;Eash-Loucks and Fautin, 2012). It can be further differentiated from Parasicyonis Carlgren, 1921, by the presence of filaments in fertile mesenteries (present in Parasicyonis; absent in S. erythrocephala) and number of perfect mesenteries (some mesenteries of fourth cycle perfect in Parasicyonis; no mesenteries of fourth cycle perfect in S. erythrocephala) (Carlgren, 1921(Carlgren, , 1949Rodríguez et al, 2008;Eash-Loucks and Fautin, 2012). From Synsicyonis Carlgren, 1921, our specimens can be differentiated by the number of cycles of mesenteries (four in Synsicyonis; up to six in Sicyonis and five in S. erythrocephala) and the fertility of the mesenteries (third cycle of mesenteries fertile in Synsicyonis; only fourth cycle of mesenteries fertile in S. erythrocephala) (Carlgren, 1921(Carlgren, , 1949Rodríguez et al, 2008).…”