Taxonomies for structuring models for World–Earth systems analysis of the Anthropocene: subsystems, their interactions and social–ecological feedback loops

Abstract

Abstract. In the Anthropocene, the social dynamics of human societies have become critical to understanding planetary-scale Earth system dynamics. The conceptual foundations of Earth system modelling have externalised social processes in ways that now hinder progress in understanding Earth resilience and informing governance of global environmental change. New approaches to global modelling of the human World are needed to address these challenges. The current modelling landscape is highly diverse and heterogeneous, ranging from purely biophysical Earth system models, to hybrid macro-economic integrated assessments models, to a plethora of models of socio-cultural dynamics. World–Earth models capable of simulating complex and entangled human–Earth system processes of the Anthropocene are currently not available. They will need to draw on and selectively integrate elements from the diverse range of fields and approaches; thus, future World–Earth modellers require a structured approach to identify, classify, select, combine and critique model components from multiple modelling traditions. Here, we develop taxonomies for ordering the multitude of societal and biophysical subsystems and their interactions. We suggest three taxa for modelled subsystems: (i) biophysical, where dynamics is usually represented by “natural laws” of physics, chemistry or ecology (i.e. the usual components of Earth system models); (ii) socio-cultural, dominated by processes of human behaviour, decision-making and collective social dynamics (e.g. politics, institutions, social networks and even science itself); and (iii) socio-metabolic, dealing with the material interactions of social and biophysical subsystems (e.g. human bodies, natural resources and agriculture). We show how higher-order taxonomies can be derived for classifying and describing the interactions between two or more subsystems. This then allows us to highlight the kinds of social–ecological feedback loops where new modelling efforts need to be directed. As an example, we apply the taxonomy to a stylised World–Earth system model that endogenises the socially transmitted choice of discount rates in a greenhouse gas emissions game to illustrate the effects of social–ecological feedback loops that are usually not considered in current modelling efforts. The proposed taxonomy can contribute to guiding the design and operational development of more comprehensive World–Earth models for understanding Earth resilience and charting sustainability transitions within planetary boundaries and other future trajectories in the Anthropocene.

Understanding the governance of sustainability pathways: hydraulic megaprojects, social–ecological traps, and power in networks of action situations

“…the role of governance in change processes towards sustainability is critical at both empirical-theoretical (how does current change happen) and normative (how change ought to happen) levels (Berkes 2007;Patterson et al 2017;Turnheim et al 2018;Donges et al 2021;Pickering et al 2022). However, despite growing attention in the last decade, the understanding of the role of governance and its underlying processes remains underdeveloped (Muñoz-Erickson et al 2016;Patterson et al 2017;Kellner 2021;Orach and Schlüter 2021;Muiderman et al 2022;Rocha et al 2022).…”

Modelling coupled human–environment complexity for the future of the biosphere: strengths, gaps and promising directions

“…One forest-grassland model included an additional term for economic foresight, finding the persistence of the forest-grassland mosaic to be highly dependent on individuals valuing long-term environmental health over long-term economic benefits [ 73 ]. In many cases, the foresight of social groups can change with time and in response to the state of the environment, as explored through a climate change model where each country's foresight in policymaking was treated as a dynamic social trait influenced through imitation [ 103 ].…”

Climate tipping points and expert judgment

“…The issue of nonepistemic values becomes even more pressing within the framework of the recent developments in Earth system science that ambition to include not only all the relevant climatic and biogeochemical processes (in the atmosphere, ocean, land, cryosphere and biosphere components), but also all the relevant aspects of the human societies themselves (in the so‐called “Anthroposphere” component), as well as interactions between these components (Donges et al, 2021). But the way to represent and model the human and social dimensions may of course be highly dependent on certain nonepistemic (e.g., socioeconomic and political) values.…”